This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
HD Video Surveillance


the point of entry and exit. Instead, standard definition or VGA cameras can be employed, and can record at reduced frame rates. This ability to use lower resolutions and


reduced frame rates is achieved because all you are seeking from these units is evidence to support continuity! The HD streams have already captured evidential quality images. The lower resolution footage only needs to establish what the individual did whilst on site. If an incident occurs, it’s a relatively simply job to link the continuity video with the HD footage.


In such a case, a site may only require two


HD cameras, and can make savings by utilising lower specification cameras in less essential areas. Additionally, the extra bandwidth and storage used by the HD streams can be offset with the reduced requirements for lower-resolution lower- bandwidth video. It is interesting that when networked


then does that mean that HD isn’t more cost- effective than standard definition video? Actually, it doesn’t. HD video surveillance can be significantly more cost effective, if it’s used in the right way!


Picture perfect


End users seek HD video because of its higher quality, which makes it ideal for positive identification and evidential purposes. Often camera positioning is something of a compromise, and as a result images of someone entering a building - for example - are not always as clear as they might be. This is where HD comes into its own. The aspect ratio gives a wider field of view, which offers better opportunities to capture a high quality image. The HD resolution ensures a clearer picture with higher levels of detail, and the secondary benefit of increased forensic examination allows that image to have moderate levels of digital zoom applied to it without pixelation becoming an issue. If a building has two entry points, then two


HD cameras will ensure that the system captures high quality real-time images of everyone that enters and leaves that site. These cameras will require slightly increased levels of bandwidth and storage over standard definition cameras, but this can then be offset across the system. Throughout the rest of the building, there no longer is a need to positively identify individuals, because this has been achieved at


16 www.benchmarkmagazine.com


cameras first appeared in the security sector, one of their downfalls was that resolution had to be kept low because of bandwidth and processing issues. Whilst VGA cameras didn’t achieve acceptance (because analogue cameras had higher resolutions), the growth of HD has actually created a reason to consider VGA units - as continuity devices! Whilst this example looks at a single scenario, it does not take a great leap of imagination to translate it to a host of other applications. The HD video effectively creates the evidential stream for positive identification, and supplementary information can then be gathered at reduced resolutions. HD video isn’t about replacing other devices or finding a way around installation problems. It’s about delivering a higher quality image that always delivers what is expected. You know that it will offer high quality real-time images, and will do so unless you actually restrict the system intentionally.


In summary


Designing a system using HD isn’t that different from designing one with standard definition cameras. The important elements are to consider where to capture higher quality images, why you need that higher quality, and how the images will be used. For many, HD is still a new approach, so much of the ‘popular’ thinking needs to be considered carefully, or you may compromise the final system.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60