Portfolio Local Government Opinion Banking on pensions
What will you remember about 30 November 2011 – other than it being St Andrew’s Day, obviously? Will it be disruption to your daily routine – schools closed; rubbish not collected; operation postponed, etc? Will it be marching down the Royal Mile? Will it be a day’s shopping in the run up to Christmas? Or will it be political parties undecided as to whether election to a Parliament meant you should stay away to show solidarity with workers, or attend and tell everybody how much solidarity you felt with those same workers? I shall remember it for several things. The first, a
confirmation of my line that ‘public sector’ is a term of description that can’t cope with the complexity of life today. Buses (in Edinburgh) were running; so were trains; the BBC was broadcasting pretty regularly and both here and in London our Parliaments appeared to be working. The one realisation that gave me pause was when the early radio weather was read by a continuity man, and I suddenly recalled the weather people are not BBC but Met Office – so mainline public sector staff. I can tell you one thing that we won’t remember it
for – as being the day the Government changed direction and decided that (some) public service pensions could roll on as they are now and all the proposed changes would be shelved and forgotten. And that would be the case even if Lord Hutton had sat quietly rather than intervening again in the debate. And please, don’t anybody affected imagine that a Scottish government (whatever the constitutional status) would do anything fundamentally different even if they weren’t able to use Westminster as a human shield. I have to declare an interest in this discussion,
though one that surprises most people who think of universities as public institutions – they are not. Like me, a good proportion of the staff who work in universities are members of the University Superannuation Scheme (USS), a private group pension scheme, not one that is operated or controlled by government at any level. And yes, that scheme too is affected by changes that university employers are trying to persuade the trustees to enact that will have the net effect of reducing benefits. And those proposed changes to the USS pension
fund are being brought forward for precisely the same reasons that the London government wants
Follow me on Twitter @HolyroodKate
to make changes for pension schemes for teachers, civil servants and health workers. We’re living longer post retirement; accumulated commitments are building up and the pressure on all spending heads means that pensions are part of a series of choices that governments at all levels will make. I know there is heated debate over the detail and trend of figures but since both sides seem to present the figures
in a way that best suits them we’ll leave that lying for the moment. The curious anomaly in all of these discussions is what the Government thinks it should seek to do with the local government scheme, which is based on a series of funded schemes and so could be treated in a very different way from the main unfunded schemes. Pensions are immensely complex, often
ignored by most until very late in their careers and clearly capable of rousing very strong emotions. Perhaps because of that, I suspect most of us will recall this 30th for Jeremy Clarkson and his video promotion stunt; sad commentary on a serious issue.
Professor Richard Kerley is Professor of Management, Queen Margaret University
www.sfha.co.uk The Scottish Federation of Housing Associations
Representing Scotland’s Housing Associations and Co-operatives
The SFHA represents housing associations and co-operatives across Scotland, who provide housing and other services for over 250,000 households.
Our members are part of communities in every constituency and region of Scotland. In addition to affordable housing they also deal with social enterprise and wider role, care and support services, and, increasingly, energy efficiency and renewables.
Our members are energetic and independent not-for-profit businesses, large and small. They employ staff and contractors accountable to committees of volunteers. The thousands of voluntary members of housing associations include tenants, local residents, and community representatives, with a wealth of expertise.
The SFHA is running a major campaign on the UK Government's proposed changes to Housing Benefit, which we believe will negatively affect tenants and housing associations throughout Scotland. To find out more about the SFHA Housing Benefits campaign or sign our petition opposing planned changes, visit
www.sfha.co.uk or contact
cmunro@sfha.co.uk
Scottish Federation of Housing Associations, Pegasus House, 4th Floor, 375 West George Street Glasgow G2 4LW Tel 0141 332 8113 Fax 0141 332 9684 Email
sfha@sfha.co.uk Subscribe to our daily e-newsletter at
www.housingscotlandtoday.com
32
www.holyrood.com 12 December 2011
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76