COMMENT


Group Editor: Georgina Bisby


gbisby@western-bp.co.uk


Editorial Support: Rebecca Cheetham Tel: 01342 333739


Art Editor: Danny Kosifou


Sales Director: Tim Else


telse@western-bp.co.uk Tel: 01342 333722


Sales Manager: Sally-Anne Wood swood@western-bp.co.uk Tel: 01342 333720


Sales Exective: Sadie Brownlie


sbrownlie@western-bp.co.uk Tel: 01342 333720


Business Development Manager: Jos Diamond


jdiamond@western-bp.co.uk


Circulation: Theresa Vaughan


tvaughan@western-bp.co.uk Publisher: Neill Western


Registered at Stationers Hall ISSN 1471-0463


Printed by Garnett Dickinson Print


Opinions expressed in HSM by individual contributors may not necessarily be those held by the publisher. Although every effort will be made to ensure the accuracy of information published, the publisher cannot accept responsibility for claims made by contributors and advertisers.


Helping to protect people at www.hsmsearch.com


Taking a fresh look at health &safety


It has taken a straight talking Swede to shine a light on the UK’s peculiar fixation with health & safety to identify how the nation can move forward.


Following the long awaited publication of Professor Löfstedt’s review into health & safety and the Government’s acceptance of its recommendations (full story page 5), in an interview on Radio 4, Löfstedt summarised the health & safety debate in the UK as “amplified and heated”. Risk management expert Löfstedt, who was born in Sweden and spent 20 years living in the US, said his impression of the discussion of health & safety in the UK is that it has become “vulgarised and no longer focused on the real issues”.


In the report Reclaiming health & safety for all: An independent review of health & safety, Löfstedt made 26 recommendations and suggested over the next three years health & safety regulation should be reduced by half. Such a seemingly radical shake up of regulations was likely designed to grab headlines but in many ways that was what it needed to do in order to reposition the role of health & safety in the minds of the nation.


Once the detail of the proposed changes are examined many of them are obvious and sensible. For example at the moment there are 6 petroleum regulations which Löfstedt suggests could be reduced to one. Löfstedt has also recommended the removal of legislation which is either, no longer relevant or is now covered by large pieces of legislation. An example is The Celluloid and Cinematograph Film Act 1922 which is to be abolished.


The recommendation that employers will not be held responsible when they have done all they can to manage a risk was particularly well received. A common complaint from employers has been that they could be sued for failing to issue employees with formal health & safety training for every day scenarios. One incident considered by the review, was that of a company being sued by a worker injured opening a gate because the employee had not been given formal training in gate-opening. Löfstedt’s review suggests there must be a greater emphasis on personal responsibility.


Another much praised element of the review was its emphasis on the need to stimulate debate about risk in society to ensure that everyone has a much better understanding of risk and its management.


Understandably there are concerns about some of the proposals, IOSH has questioned how the scale and speed of the reforms can be achieved without compromising safety and the TUC highlighted the report’s absence of any discussion as to how the UK’s health & safety record could be improved.


Western Business Publishing, 33-35 Cantelupe Road, East Grinstead,


West Sussex RH19 3BE Tel: 01342 314300 Fax: 01342 333700 admin@western-bp.co.uk


But equally there are opportunities, one of the most significant being to change the UK’s perception of health and safety for the better. Löfstedt’s review into health & safety set out to reduce the burden of health & safety regulation on the UK, what it offers is a fresh start for, “the UK to no longer see health & safety as a burden”. Löfstedt concluded in his radio interview that the responsibility to deliver this lies with everyone including academia, the Government and industry and that from now on we must be being very careful in the language that we use to discuss health & safety so that its true value is brought to the fore.


Georgina Bisby Group Editor


Health & Safety Matters gbisby@western-bp.co.uk


4


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68