This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LEGAL SERVICES


Article VII of MLC, 2006 for countries that do not count with organisations representing shipowners and seafarers. AMP expects to conclude the process of legal unification and adaptation by the end of 2011, after which owners and operators of Panama flag vessels will be able to apply for voluntary certification. The Panama’s Public Registry for ship and mortgage registrations has moved in to the AMP building and works around the clock since January 2011. The change has made it much easier to deal with Asian and European shipowners. Before the move into the AMP building, Panama Consulates would have to call in advance to request a Public Registry employee’s availability in the middle of the night, during Asian or European business hours. ‘It was a positive decision. The system is working well,’ lawyers have said. The 1998 law creating the AMP contemplated incorporation of the Public Registry, but this didn’t happen until January 2011. ‘Having everything under the same roof has proved to be a fantastic


improvement,’ says lawyer Tomas Avila of Avila & Co. ’The Public Registry’s efficiency also forces us [lawyers] to be more efficient,’ he adds. However, there are still some adjustments needed to make the hardware and software of the Public Registry, the AMP’s merchant marine department and maritime security compatible, he notes.


In 2006, Spain’s INDRA Sistemas was awarded the contract to design and implement the digitisation of the AMP. This included fitting offices with fibre optics, allowing video calls between Panama’s headquarters and regional merchant marine offices and consulates as well as creating a 24-hour call centre for AMP customers and producing the digitised ‘seafarers passport’. As INDRA’s contract ended in July 2011 and, with the installation complete, AMP will now have the opportunity to harmonise the electronic systems and create one model for hardware and software. As a contribution to AMP’s


harmonisation goals, the PMLA plans to propose to the Public Registry unified forms of applications for preliminary registration of ownership titles and mortgages, using a format more suited to shipowners and consular officials. ‘We also want to update the Panama standard form Bill of Sale,’ explained PMLA president Jazmina Rovi, who took office in April 2011.


One of the most important PMLA goals is basically to put the Maritime Arbitration Centre (CECOMAP, Centro de Conciliacion, Mediacion y Arbitraje Maritimo de Panama) to work. This has been in the making for some years, with


PANAMA MARITIME REVIEW 2011/12 83


all the side work completed, i.e. legal framework duly approved by supervising Government bodies and drafting of regulations and tariffs. CECOMAP rules for administration of maritime arbitration processes were approved by its Board of Directors on August 2011 with the strong support of both the PMLA and the Panama Chamber of Shipping. Several programmes are being put together, by local and foreign academic entities, to offer continued training on arbitration to those willing to be included in CECOMAP’s list of arbitrators. Law 8 of 1982 as further modified by Law 11 of 1986 and more recently by Law 12 of 2009, details the mechanisms of the Maritime Courts, the Maritime Courts of Appeal and the Arbitration Centre on maritime procedures and establishes the bases for modern and friendly procedures. Although lawyers have been pressing the judiciary to establish the Court of Maritime Appeals, there is only one final step to make it a reality: getting the budget necessary to give life to the Court created by the last modification to the Maritime Code of Procedure in 2009, says leading maritime litigator Juan Felipe Pitty, who was a former PMLA president twice. The Court of Maritime Appeals functions under a Magistrate, who among other requirements must be a lawyer with specialised studies in maritime law, be fluent in English and have no less than 10 years of professional practice in the field of maritime law as a practioner, teacher or member of the Judiciary system. However, the Judge of the Maritime Court only requires five years of similar professional experience. The Court of Maritime Appeals is expected to strengthen the maritime judicial system and to expedite, solving maritime cases that have been lagging in the system. ‘Maritime litigation in Panama results in one of the swiftest judicial procedures, with only two legal instances for any case,


first being tried at the Maritime Court, and now under the new law, going up on final appeal to the Tribunal of Maritime Appeals, which should result in final decisions within two years. By comparison competitive jurisdictions take three years or substantially more,’ says Pitty. Closer teamwork between the AMP and the PMLA is profitable for the industry say experts of the trade. The association has been keen to work harmoniously and closely with the AMP that oversees the sector.


Most maritime lawyers feel that there are still issues to address, which have lingered because of the change of administration. One in particular is the activation of the AMP International Maritime Advisory Council, which was included in Decree Law 7 of 1998 that created the Maritime Authority, with professionals of the sector and which is designed to improve and develop Panama’s merchant marine. The maritime sector business has significantly grown in activities related to ports, cargo and bunkering as well as the demand for legal services and migration affairs, that have increased substantially. The Canal expansion, when concluded, will drive more shipping companies to Panama making the country the prime transhipment regional centre, with prospects for a strong growth in legal services. Juan Felipe Pitty has already expanded into this area with the creation in early 2011 of Easter Star Management Inc. dedicated to ship management and back office needs for international vessels from Panama.


‘The future of Panama as a maritime centre is brighter than ever, and our ability to attract ship management services to complement our logistical platform following the Singapore model, as we are beginning to do, is a natural fit that can benefit the industry,’ says Pitty. •


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112