This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FOCUS POWER UPDATE


Issue 18, October/November


FOCUS UPDATE: POWER


(UEC) was entering a market wide open. As one industry source put it: “They were it.” Today the company is looking at a market full of heavyweight competitors.


W


If UEC’s main challenge in the 1990s was convincing data center operators that the busway technology — which has been around for about 100 years — was better than dragging cables under the raised floor, today it also has to convince them it is better than the comparable products by at least five other vendors pushing it aggressively into the data center space.


Joel Ross, president of UEC’s Starline business, says: “We were the first [company] to push for this method of power distribution in data centers. Today we see that other manufacturers are in the market as well.”


UEC’s key competitors in the space are APC by Schneider Electric, Emerson, Eaton, GE and PDI. Up to this point, the companies have mainly been differentiating their busway products by offering different degrees of customization, varying allowable power densities, keeping the electrical track fully enclosed, or keeping it exposed for quicker deployment of plug receptacles, as well as offering different ways to add busway.


Many of the vendors also offer 380V direct- current versions of busway systems, although the reportedly more energy-efficient option has yet to gain general acceptance by the industry.


Many, like Douglas Taylor, manager of busway solutions sales and marketing for the Americas at Eaton, believe the next technological shift in the busway technology for data centers is integration with Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) solutions. .


“Metering is probably the newest thing right now,” Taylor says, explaining that Eaton is taking its busway product in this direction.


54 www.datacenterdynamics.com


hen it brought its Starline Track busway into the data center space in the 1990s, Universal Electric Corporation


POWER DISTRIBUTION VENDORS The data center busway market has reached its own but the challenges haven’t stopped at winning over the market. Vendors must look towards intelligence, as Yevgeniy Sverdlik discovers


“Branch-circuit monitoring — that is where the product may be different next year.”


When it rolls out its metered busway, Eaton is going to provide its own meters that will communicate data using an industry-standard protocol. The company is currently making efforts to gauge the industry’s overall opinion on what that protocol should be.


Gary Anderson, business development


manager for AC Power at Emerson, says DCIM capabilities for busway will become a mainstay. The current challenge, however, lies in determining how much data is necessary to collect and what is the best way to use that data.


Since the busway happens to delineate responsibilities between IT


and facilities


staff, the data it collects needs to be useful to both sides of the house. Facilities staff are responsible for infrastructure up to the rack PDU, and IT staff are concerned with what happens from the plug level up to IT gear.


Some early examples of integrating DCIM capabilities with busway include DCIM vendor FieldView providing monitoring for UEC’s Starline Track product, and PDI’s integration of its PowerWave busway system with WaveStar, its own branch-circuit monitoring system.


GAINING MOMENTUM


Ross says UEC first started selling busway power-distribution systems in the late 1980s, primarily for industrial deployments. The company brought the technology into the data center market in the 1990s, as the size of the Internet infrastructure ballooned and data centers became more energy intensive.


According to Ross, “it took years” after the technology came to market before it gained recognition as a viable option for the data center. Over time, as more data center customers deployed the product, enough “critical mass” built up to convince the general industry that busway was reliable enough for data centers. Today, the data center industry is responsible for nearly half of UEC’s busway sales.


SMARTER BUSWAY — THE NEXT BATTLE FOR


A section of UEC’s Starline Track busway, on display at the DatacenterDynamics’ event in Washington, DC


Eaton’s history with the technology has been radically different. While the company had offered industrial busway solutions since the 1930s, it only brought its solution into the data center market in 2009.


It took Eaton about two years to adopt the busway product for data center use, Taylor says. The product it offers to the data center market now is the 24th busway design released since the company began to sell the industrial busway.


Emerson data center busway was the first busway product the company had ever offered. Emerson became one of the latest entrants into this space when it announced its Liebert MB modular busway in May 2010.


Emerson based its solution on an industrial version Siemens had earlier released, and adapted it for use in the data center. Key modifications included putting outlets on one side of the track, since the Siemens solution had them on alternating sides, and making customized plugs available.


The busway technology has undoubtedly gained a foothold in the data center space and the vendors no longer have a hard time convincing customers of its benefits against conventional power distribution. The next battleground is integration with DCIM. n


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96