This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Mind & Brain, the Journal of Psychiatry It is important to note that the SAAF had a positive effect on


high genetic risk (as represented by the serotonin transporter gene) that is not specific to substance use or addiction. It is quite plausible that there are some common mechanisms in brain function that cause the use of substances in adoles- cence. For example, some researchers focus on the construct of behavioral disinhibition (which includes cognitive control, impulsivity, and sensitivity to reward) as representing a common genetic liability to externalizing behavioral pro- blems along with substance use.46 However, these authors do suggest that there may be specificity as well in terms of genetic reactivity to specific substances. As such, the potential of incorporating specific plausible genes related to risk for substance use into intervention studies is thus a potentially exciting direction for future research.


Although concepts and methods are still very much works


in progress, such as integrating environmental measures in genome-wide association studies,47,48 the utility of consider- ing inclusion with substance-specific genetic markers in intervention studies is clearly worth considering. This work will of course dovetail with the emerging database on specific genes of relevance for reactivity to substances in both adults and adolescents.33,4952


Concluding Remarks What are the especially important messages for intervention


scientists and practitioners? First, there should be a sense of energy that comes from the multiple converging perspectives that argue for the importance of psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing adolescent substance use. Furthermore, it is intriguing that genetic epidemiological work provides some of the strongest evidence supporting the role of the psychosocial environment as an etiological factor for initiation of substance use as well as level of use in adolescence. There is a synergy between this perspective and the empirical base supporting it, and the content areas targeted by many of the leading and empirically supported family-based psychosocial interven- tions. And finally, we are now seeing in the literature theoretical models and empirical studies that bring genetics into psychosocial interventions in order to examine how these approaches may specifically benefit youth at high risk for risky behavior including substance use. Taken together, this is an exciting time for psychosocial interventions focused on adolescent substance use. Much of the enthusiasm for their potential efficacy comes from considerations of how they may, in the future, prevent the development of substance abuse and dependence by providing a developmentally timed, and environmentally delivered, blockade to gene expression. As such, intervention scientists and practitioners now have many reasons to, at least conceptually, consider the critical im- portance of their work in the postgenomic era.


Funding: This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. AA017659).


REFERENCES


1. Deas D. Evidence-based treatments for alcohol use disorders in adolescents. Pediatrics. 2008;121(suppl 4):S348S354.


M&B 2011; 2:(1). July 2011 54


2. Dishion TJ, Stormshak E. Intervening in Children’s Lives: An Ecological, Family- Centered Approach to Mental Health Care. Washington, DC: APA Books; 2007.


3. Spoth R, Greenberg M, Turrisi R. Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: state of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics. 2008;121(suppl 4):S311S336.


4. Witt ED. Research on alcohol and adolescent brain development: opportunities and future directions. Alcohol. 2010;44:119124.


5. Hingson RW, Heeren T, Winter MK. Age at drinking onset and alcohol dependence: age at onset, duration, and severity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:739746.


6. Hu MC, Davies M, Kandel DB. Epidemiology and correlates of daily smoking and nicotine dependence among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:299308.


7. King KM, Chassin L. A prospective study of the effects of age of initiation of alcohol and drug use on young adult substance dependence. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68:256265.


8. Agrawal A, Grant JD, Waldron M., et al. Risk for initiation of substance use as a function of age of onset of cigarette, alcohol, and cannabis use: findings in a Midwestern female twin cohort. Prev Med. 2006;43:125128.


9. Kokkevi A, Gabhainn SN, Spyropoulou M; and Risk Behavior Group Focus Group of the HBSC. Early initiation of cannabis use: a cross- national European perspective. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:712719.


10. Sartor CE, Agrawal A, Lynskey MT, Bucholz KK, Madden PAF, Heath AC. Common genetic influences on the timing of first use for alcohol, cigarettes, and cannabis in young African-American women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;102:4955.


11. Grucza RA, Beirut LJ. Co-occuring risk factors for alcohol dependence and habitual smoking: update on findings from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health, 2006;29:172178.


12. Schmidt B, Hohm E, Blomeyer D, et al. Concurrent alcohol and tobacco use during early adolescence characterizes a group at risk. Alcohol. 2007;42:219225.


13. Vieira DL, Ribiero M, Laranjeira R. Evidence of association between early alcohol use and risk of later problems. Rev Bras Psiquaitr. 2007;29:222 227.


14. Odgers CL, Caspi A, Nagin DS, et al. Is it important to prevent early exposure to drugs and alcohol among adolescents? Psychol Sci. 2008;19:10371044.


15. Guerri C, Pascual M. Mechanisms involved in the neurotoxic, cognitive, and neurobehavioral effects of alcohol consumption during adolescence. Alcohol. 2010;44:1526.


16. Maldonado-Devincci AM, Badanich KA, Kirstein CL. Alcohol during adolescence selectively alters immediate and long-term behavior and neurochemistry. Alcohol. 2010;44:5766.


17. Windle M, Spear LP, Fuligni AJ, Angold A, Brown JD, Pine D, Smith GT, Giedd J, Dahl RE. Transitions into underage and problem drinking: developmental processes and mechanisms between 10 and 15 years of age. Pediatrics 2008;121 suppl 4:S273S289.


18. Wittchen HU, Behrendt S, Hofler M, et al. What are the high risk periods for incident substance use and transitions to use and dependence? Implications for early intervention and prevention. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(suppl 1):S16S29.


19. Sherva R, Wilhelmsen K, Pomerleau CS, et al. Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha 5 (CHRNA5) with smoking status and with ‘pleasurable buzz’ during early experimentation with smoking. Addiction. 2008;103:1544 1552.


20. Doubeni CA, Reed G, Difranza JR Early course of nicotine dependence in adolescent smokers. Pediatrics. 2010;125:11271133.


21. O’Loughlin J, Karp I, Koulis T, Paradis G, Difranza J. Determinants of first puff and daily cigarette smoking in adolescents. Am J Epidem. 2009;170:585597.


22. Rose JS, Dierker LC, Donny E. Nicotine dependence symptoms among recent onset adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;106:126132.


23. Agrawal A, Lynskey MT. The genetic epidemiology of cannabis use, abuse and dependence. Addiction. 2006;101:801812.


24. Poelen EA, Derks EM, Engels RC, et al. The relative contribution of genes and environment to alcohol use in early adolescents: are similar factors related to initiation of alcohol use and frequency of drinking? Alc Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:975982.


www.slm-psychiatry.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89