Kaloam - what is going on?
Following last year’s issues, what is the situation regarding the supply of Kaloam in 2011? Pitchcare has received various statements and comment about its availability and compatibility
WHEN a batch of Kaloam, more akin to gravel, was delivered to cricket groundsmen last year, it brought consternation and criticism from those that had been affected.
Fast forward a couple of months and the suppliers, Monro Horticulture Ltd., trading as Monro Sport, went into receivership, leaving genuine concerns about the supply of this popular product through 2011.
Perhaps the biggest concern was that there was no comment from those in the know. The silence was deafening, leading the way to rumour and conjecture, much of it posted on the Pitchcare message board for all to read.
Monro Sport were an amalgam of companies, including Goundrey, Binder Loams and Roffeys, with Alan Ford and Philip Furner heading up the group.
Now, it appears that, out of the ashes of Monro, Binder Loams and Roffey Brothers have continued trading, with both companies able to offer ‘Kaloam’, or a derivitive. Both companies have issued statements.
Philip Furner, Manager of Binder Loams said “I would like to put the record straight regarding the incorrect information that has been quoted by our competitors hoping to score off our unfortunate circumstances. It has been reported that Monro Horticulture Ltd. was placed in receivership, This is incorrect, it is in administration.”
“As a result, Binder Loams, a division of Monro Horticulture, has continued to trade throughout the administration and has since been purchased as a going concern, and is now trading as Binder Loams Ltd.”
“Despite the administration of Monro Horticulture Ltd., and the demise of Monro Sport as a marketing name, Binders continued to trade through this difficult period, there was no break in service at Binders, all orders were fulfilled, all the staff retained and everything continued as normal.”
Ongar Loam™, Ongar Loam™ plus, Binders Cricket Pitch Dressing, Super Surrey, and now Kaloam 2011, are being produced and are available at any time from Binders.”
From Roffey Brothers came this statement; “We are pleased to announce that we are now undertaking the manufacture and supply of the original Kaloam, as produced at Enstone prior to its closure. In addition, Mr Alan Ford,
who has been manufacturing Kaloam for the past decade, joins us on a consultancy basis.”
“We have secured enough supply of original Kaloam (clay from the Oxford/Kettering area) for the foreseeable future.”
In addition, Alan Ford commented; “It is most important that this original material is used, as any variation from it will cause panning, root sheer and have a different binding strength. Use of any variant will not be apparent for a couple of years when the wicket is likely to develop variable bounce and speed.”
Entering the debate, and perhaps adding to the confusion, came GSB Loams’ David Goodjohn. “We have sourced materials identical to and compatible with the loam previously called Kaloam. Respecting the legal restrictions still in effect, we have classified the material as ‘loam suitable for topdressing a cricket square or tennis court built from Goundrey or Banbury Loam’ (names also associated with the same product). This phrase may be long winded, but it acknowledges the legal restrictions in place surrounding the name more readily used to describe such a type of loam.”
Roffeys Managing Director, Trevor Poole, comments; “Restoring the integrity of Kaloam, following last year's issues, is our priority and, by utilising ISO 9001 Quality Assurance, should ensure that this is achieved. Maintaining recent prices remains our second priority. Orders are being co-ordinated by Technical Sales Manager, Dave Morland. He is available, along with Alan Ford, to carry out health checks and help resolve issues on your wicket.”
Philip Furner states: “You will note that we have included Kaloam 2011 within our product range, as the Monro Enstone depot that did produce Kaloam last year is no longer operational. We have sourced material, had it analysed for its suitability and ability to be successfully used on existing Kaloam pitches, and will be produced to the same exacting standard as you have come to expect from Binders.”
Both Binders and Roffeys have an historical claim to the Kaloam brand name but, as Pitchcare editor, Laurence Gale stated; “At the end of the day, it is just soil. As long as it is compatible with what groundsmen are
ETL get A2LA European Turfgrass Laboratories achieve re-accreditation
EUROPEAN Turfgrass Laboratories Ltd., have been re-accredited by the A2LA (American Association for Laboratory Accreditation) in the Geotechnical/Putting Green Materials field of testing (Certificate No. 903.01) for the eighth time. ETL have been accredited in this field since 1997 and this accreditation is now extended until April 2013.
Accreditation is a key component to the 6
business and it ensures that ETL remain on the soil physical testing laboratories list approved by the USGA - currently, 1 of 10 such laboratories in the world to achieve this status.
The re-accreditation process is carried out every two years where an external assessor from the A2LA visits the laboratory and audits the quality management system, the premises and the staff. This constant monitoring
ensures that ETL remains one of the leading sportsturf testing centres in the world.
ETL’s scope of accreditation includes analysis required for testing to the 2004 USGA Recommendations. Copies of this scope are available upon request.
Please contact Sharon Bruce on 01786 449195.
www.etl-ltd.com
Philip Furner, Binder Loams Ltd
already using, there should be no problem. I would, though, urge every groundsman using Kaloam to carry out motty tests prior to parting with their hard earned cash.”
David Goodjohn concurs. “Our product is already being successfully used, and you are welcome to test through motties and other processes to establish compatability for yourself, rather than having to rely on others.”
GSB’s David Goodjohn
Michael Atherton, Head Groundsman at King William’s College on the Isle of Man, and one originally affected by last year’s poor batch of product says; “If in doubt, do your own tests or, even better, consult with a respected, independent agronomist. If you are not 100% sure what is in the bags, don’t put it on your squares.”
“For many of those who were hit with the ‘Kastone’ (myself included), you already have enough rubbish in your square - why add another potential problem - know the product that you are putting on your square, and its compatibility with the material that is already there. The only way anything goes on my squares, amidst the current confusion, is if each product has been tested by myself (motties), and independent lab analysis - and suitable results are achieved with all tests. If suitable test results aren’t achieved, it isn’t going on my squares, regardless of what type of loam, or ‘name’ it has.”
As we were going to press we were informed of ongoing issues regarding the use of the Kaloam name. These have still to be resolved, but we are assured that a loam suitable for use on kaloam squares and courts is available, albeit not in name at the current time.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148