This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Law


Jersey is in danger of losing pace entirely unless it can get its legislation out quicker


later, it has only just been approved by the States. The States seemed to have been striving for the perfect solution, but in the meantime the island has been left with a law introduced in 1911. Wouldn’t it be better to make the changes, even if the new law needed further tweaking? Mark Renouf, Partner at Hanson-Renouf,


certainly thinks so. “We would have had much more chance of landing the likes of Google or Amazon with a law a few years out of date, than with one drafted when wax cylinders were de rigueur and the iPod was 89 years in the future,” he states. So, how to solve the problem? Outsourcing


storage industries are now massive. International data-flows across the Bailiwick now exceed South Africa’s, despite a population of a mere 65,000 (compared to South Africa’s 49 million). It’s not hard to see the benefits that accompany the swift introduction of legislation – especially when many agree that Jersey desperately needs to diversify away from its reliance on financial services. Failure to act quickly now may see


The drafting process


Laws are born in two stages. First, the department behind the Bill develops the substance of the policy. They then pass the instructions to the draftsmen, who must express the concept as a coherent and effective law. These initial instructions are crucial. Nothing matters more than the ideas that form


the backbone of the policy, so the working proposal needs to be detailed and relatively complete. Hence the time often given to consultation periods and working groups, and the release of green and white papers. Yet often a lack of time or money means the instructions aren’t decent enough to begin with. As it’s almost impossible to nail all of a law’s implications at once, the policy tends


to evolve throughout the back-and-forth of the drafting process. The draftsman argue the finer details with the relevant officials before preparing a first draft, which goes back to the department for them to scrutinise and throw in their tuppence-worth. These steps are repeated until the project’s ready to move on to debate in the States and finally to the Privy Council. The content, then, is very much a two-way thing – legal draftsmen add original


ideas as the policy evolves, and comments from the issuing department influence how the law is finally expressed. And if that law isn’t up to scratch, the officials and the draftsman are both liable to be held to account. One side, however tends to bear the brunt – it tends to be the draftsmen who get it in the neck.


18 businesslife.co April/May 2011


even more money flow the way of internet traffic – away from the island and to the coffers of the competition.


Dealing with the problem Yet if Jersey’s approach to intellectual property legislation is anything to go by, the lesson hasn’t been learnt. The draft Intellectual Property (Unregistered Rights) Law was introduced in 2002, and now, nine years


is often touted as a solution. South Africa has outsourced the drafting of its IP laws, but Jersey’s draftsmen insist they’ve tried it with no success. “A draftsman needs to be in office, to be highly skilled, and to understand the quirks of Jersey legislation,” says Staley. “That’s a rare combination. It’s cheaper and more effective to keep it in-house.” Staley’s equivalent in Guernsey, Robert


Titterington, agrees. “Outsourcing is OK if you can find someone who knows your legal system,” he says. “But if they don’t, it doesn’t really work.” Other ideas are equally forthcoming.


Renouf urges cutting the consultation process, and says the States need to prioritise financial services laws. “We could introduce a dedicated ring-fenced fund for finance industry legislation, so that there’s always a team working on these particular laws and encouraging the private sector to maintain the island’s prosperity.” The hitch here is that prioritising laws


is a political issue – thus ripe for yet more prevarication. But with good reason perhaps. Over-emphasise financial services legislation and you’re in danger of wider social issues getting pushed off the agenda. “The Council of Ministers aims for a balance,” says Staley. “Otherwise we’d hear an outcry.” While the relevant players continue to


debate a solution to the slow development of new laws, the pack is pedalling ahead. Jersey is in danger of losing pace entirely unless it can get its legislation out quicker. “Our most important social investment is actually to make sure the wealth continues to be generated,” says Renouf. Perhaps it’s time to finally shift gears. n


DAVE WALLER is a freelance business journalist


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78