INDULGENCES work out by martin alonzo
HOW TO LOSEUNWANTED BODY FAT FOREVER
IF YOU ARE LIKE ME, THEN YOU PROBABLY HAVE ASKED
YOURSELF: “With all the dietary doctrine and fat loss drugs available, why is it still so hard for people to be lean, lose un- wanted body-fat, and be healthy?” or “Why do people who exercise hard get little result?” It’s a simple question with a less than simple answer. Part of the problem is that nutritional literature tends to
be biased by the reader’s personality and experience with food, since eating and food relationships are emotionally influenced. Another is profit: if there is financial motiva- tion, for example when the sale of supplements is the bot- tom line, drug-efficacy is usually out the window.
Aside from emotional bias and financial profit, overall we are all entirely individ- ualistic; meaning our bodies, environments, thoughts, motivations and abilities, etc., are specific to us as a unique individual with a lifestyle not necessarily taken into account with conventional approaches. Most, if not all the information that you get from a book or advertisement is created for a one size fits all scheme, which is a poor design since as mentioned we all have unique life circumstances that effect us on a daily basis. For example; if you take two people who are the same age and sex, that play the same sport and share similar physical attributes, would their nutritional requirements be the same? Would they receive the same nutritional effect if they ate the exact same foods in the same proportions? The answer would be a resounding no. Nutrition should be individualistic by nature and specific to that person’s biological needs at that given time in their lives. Nutri- tional requirements are much more dynamic then just a simplified mathematical/ logical protocol. The mental/emotional state of any person must be taken into account, since
your physical body is just as, if not more, influenced and governed by your physiological/psychological/spiritual body (metaphysical) condition. All work symbiotically. If we go back to our hypothetical individuals who are seemingly replicas of each other and take a more comprehensive look, we might find that one is under
58 RAGE monthly | APRIL 2011
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92