This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Conscious well-being


Advertorial Supplement


Sarah Turner, Head of Research, NES Health Limited


For centuries the door between conventional and frontier science has been closed, with each group of researchers isolated in their own domains, working with radically different models of biology and physics. The conventional domain focused on matter and biochemical processes. The frontier domain focused on energy and information fields. We at NES are happy to report that the door finally has been kicked wide open—and frontier scientists everywhere have reason to celebrate. The ‘ghostly’ energetic and informational signals of matter have been detected in a conventional laboratory—and conventional scientists are in an uproar as their beliefs and paradigms are being shaken to their very foundations.


Over the last decade or more, NES research has championed the idea that reality is wave-based, that fields of energy and information underlie all matter, and that substances such as water and minerals can be encoded with field signals from matter that can be used by the body-field to correct distortions in the field and so enhance the body’s own self-healing capacities. We have been patiently awaiting the day when conventional scientists try their own experiments—and now they have.


Disclaimer


NES Health and its products do not cure, prevent, diagnose or treat disease. If you have a medical condition or concern, please consult the appropriate healthcare professional. NES and its claims have not been evaluated by any government agency or regulatory organisation.


30 Quantum Health


The Experiment Heard ‘Round the World’ What’s the experiment that has so many scientists in such an uproar? It was carried out by Nobel Prize-winning biologist Luc Montagnier and reported on in New Scientist (12 January 2011) and the popular press. Although Montagnier has not released details yet, and he is waiting to do so until his paper is accepted for publication


in a juried academic journal, the gist of his work has been widely described and his conclusions are the subject of intense debate and scepticism. He claims that he and his colleagues have been able to ‘transmit’ the ‘ghostly’ signature of DNA into water and that the electromagnetic imprint of the DNA molecule was detected by enzymes that were able to use it to replicate the DNA just as if they had been in contact with the real molecule.


Specifically, in one test tube Montagnier suspended a sample of DNA in liquid and then diluted it twelve times. In another test tube he put only purified water. The test tubes were then subjected to a very weak extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field of 7 hz (similar to the natural frequency of the earth’s magnetic field) from a copper coil and left for eighteen hours. After the procedure, the energetic signature of the DNA was somehow ‘transmitted’ or its information ‘imprinted’ onto the pure water in the other test tube. Later, enzymes were able to use that electromagnetic signature to reconstruct the DNA. Montagnier claims that the only explanation for such information transfer is a quantum coherence effect.


It’s important to note that the effect was not found to work at high dilutions, so this experiment does not lend wholesale support to homeopathy, which tends to use extremely high dilutions. However, the experiment does lend credence to earlier experiments done by French researcher Jacques Benveniste, who showed how water can be imprinted with information from a substance, such that water appears to have a ‘memory’. His work was roundly dismissed by conventional science. In fact, Benenviste was hounded out of his laboratory


www.quantumhealthmagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76