May 2010 | ifr special report | 9 SOVEREIGN DCM Greece and Turkey 5yr CDS levels
The euro deal was the first euro- denominated trade the Republic had done for three years and came after 11 successive US dollar deals. Tuffey believes that the sovereign may return to the euro- denominated market again this year, possibly by tapping existing issues as a way to improve the euro component of its debt profile.
This kind of selectivity and flexibility in funding is also shown in the plan to issue a 10-year US$1bn-equivalent Samurai that will be backed by Japanese government agency JBIC. It is a sign of the strength of the sovereign credit and the flexibility given by its limited funding targets that it can choose to embark on such a deal.
Show of faith
While the sovereign has been buoyed up by the strength of the country’s underlying economy and its banking system, it can even be argued that the credit of the Republic is actually stronger than that of the underlying Turkish economy. Even though the overall economy contracted last year by 6.5%, this year Turkey’s credit rating was one of the very few in the world to be upgraded (to Ba2 by Moody’s in January).
Moreover, the spreads that Turkey has to
pay international investors to hold its sovereign paper is a fraction of that of its neighbours, in particular Greece or Kazakhstan. For a country that is sitting on no natural resources (like those in the Middle East), is without huge foreign currency reserves (like many countries in Asia), this is nothing short of remarkable, especially at this stage of the cycle. Indeed, Turkey’s credit lies squarely on the faith in- ternational investors have with how the government is running the economy. “Turkey is one of the few sovereigns that has been upgraded in recent years and its bonds now trade in line with investment- grade countries,” said Murat Demirel, Managing Director and Head of Banking for Turkey at Citigroup. “Turkey stacks up well in practically all credit metrics, and I think it is only a matter of time before the rating agencies catch up with the market and assign Turkey investment-grade ratings.” The strength of Turkey’s banking system and low levels of external debt make such a step more likely. However, a febrile political situation does negatively impact the country’s credit.
The key political tension is generated by the plans of the current ruling party, the AKP, to introduce a series of amendments
“Turkey has managed the crisis extremely well. Much of this is related to events unfolding elsewhere in the region, but it also has lots to do with the previous restructuring of the banking market in Turkey. ”
to the constitution over the summer. Guessing how this will play out is the parlour game of choice among most Turks at the moment. There are many possible results of the action being postulated, ranging from the opposition taking the issue to the constitutional court, referenda on the new measures, the eventual banning of the AKP, early elections – or everything in between.
What is remarkable is that in years gone
by, such a tense political situation would in turn have gummed up the international credit markets for Turkey. But in a measure of how far things have come in the last few years, international markets are much more sanguine about Turkey’s outlook than the domestic markets. This is partly explained by natural Turkish preponder- ance to assume the worst. But it also testament for how far the Turkish economy stands out in relation to its neighbours, especially its perennial sparring partner Greece.
Getting in early
Even so, with the political tension rising, the Republic is likely to not only complete its 2010 funding target as soon as possible, but also to try to pre-fund some of next year’s target while the going remains good. 2011 is an election year anyway, and this will have a negative impact on the Republic’s ability to tap the international markets, even without the added political tension that exists already.
Markets will look on any approach by the Republic favourably for the absolute reasons of how the country has managed through the financial crisis and for reasons relative to how others have mismanaged their economies. “Turkey has managed the crisis extremely well,” said Fawzi Kyriakos Saad, CEO, EMEA for Credit Suisse in London. “Much of this is related to events unfolding elsewhere in the region, but it also has lots to do with the previous restructuring of the banking market in Turkey. As a result the sovereign has a very clean balance sheet and good ratios.”
The ultimate expression of this increase in credibility came when it was announced in April that Turkey would not be signing another standby agreement with the IMF and would be going it alone. “This is a big difference,” said Saad. “A year and a half ago the question was when Turkey would need to call in the IMF. Now it is just completely off the table.”
Standing out from the crowd is a lonely business, but Turkey needs to ensure it makes the most of its time in the spotlight. If the crisis can teach us anything, it is that things can unravel very quickly in the international capital markets.
1,000 800 600 400 200 0
2 Jan 08
Source: Thomson Reuters, Markit 2 May 2 Sep
2 Jan 09
2 May 2 Sep
2 Jan 10
| Page 2
| Page 3
| Page 4
| Page 5
| Page 6
| Page 7
| Page 8
| Page 9
| Page 10
| Page 11
| Page 12
| Page 13
| Page 14
| Page 15
| Page 16
| Page 17
| Page 18
| Page 19
| Page 20