REGISTER FOR YOUR FREE COPY OF AEROSPACE MANUFACTURING BY VISITING: WWW.AERO-MAG.COM


COMPOSITES I TOOLING 34 AEROSPACEMANUFACTURING | SEPTEMBER 2010


Heavy goods: Large tooling frames are required to transport the Airbus A350 composite wing components


BY FRAME I


FRAME


Dr Neil Calder takes a closer look at Belgium’s Acrosoma NV and how it has used its trailer structure tooling frame experience to win vital transportation project work.


have previously reported the emerging capabilities of Acrosoma, evolving from its roots as Composite Trailer through


a number of key contracts in aerospace and defence as business development intentions are becoming reality. The company had originally configured


itself to make large stiffened panels to meet a requirement for trailer structures for the road haulage market, but the engineering needs and business dynamics have given it the capability to address other markets as well. The most recent of these is in large


tooling frames consistent with the requirements of moving Airbus A350 XWB composite wing components between and around various Airbus production facilities. These lifting frames therefore have implications not only in their mass for handling but also in transportation over considerable distances by air and surface means. The critical design factor here was


the ability to produce a tooling solution that was stiff but at a realistic weight. The traditional steel tooling would have weighed about three times as much, but the Acrosoma solution for a 33m by 9m frame weighed in at 3.5 tonnes for an increase in stiffness and negligible thermal expansion. Previous experience in constructing road haulage structures, which are exposed to in-service loadings


of up to 20g, paved the way for a more relaxed requirement of 6g for the transport frames. The skin of the panel structure


material is a mix of woven glass and unidirectional carbon, with a PET foam core. The through-stitching is in aramid yarn and the matrix material is a thermoplastic vinyl ester. The interesting point here is not that a


composite solution can produce a higher mechanical performance for a given mass, compared to its metallic alternative. We’ve known this for years. The uniqueness of the Acrosoma panels is in the quasi-continuous production method which means a very cost-effective and low cost way of achieving the design


requirements. It is the batching of the cure cycle through autoclave methods or dedicated tooling for example, which causes a discontinuous production cycle. The failure mode for sandwich panels


is generally in delamination of the interface joint between the skin and core components. Acrosoma’s technique of through-stitching usually with aramid yarns, although adding an extra process to the production method increases the performance of the structures and allows some design freedom. Structures are built up by cutting and


joining sections from the panel, and can also incorporate filament winding where this adds to the structural integrity of the finished component. Acrosoma has demonstrated considerable success in the manufacture of box section components, which are finished in-house before delivery to the customer. As this is the first application of its


kind for this company, it is probably fair to say that other similar uses will become known in the coming months and years. The cost versus benefit advantage of these stiffened panels has also been used in demonstration for the US Department of Defence in a requirement for expeditionary airfield matting, where it outperformed the existing requirement


Critical design factor: Acrosoma produced a tooling solution that was stiff, but still at a realistic weight


by many times. ❙ www.acrosoma.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52