UFOs anullnull around
nullnullnulln nullunnullnullnullke has read the proposed Anglican Covenant
but is unconvinced that it will deliver what is hoped of it
null
n null nullecember a body of rightly, sees a ‘church’ in terms of a the adherents of liberal fashion, it can
which null had never heard, the bishop, clergy and people, a definition never be clawed bacnull.
anull nding nullomminullee of the to which the nullovenant pays lipnull nullobody nowadays pays the least
nullnglican nullommunion nullnullnull null service null.nullnull while tanullnulling about anullention to the rather strinulling terms in
issued a final tenullt of the proposed ‘national and regional nullhurches. ’ nullt which the nullnull nullambeth nullonference
nullnglican nullovenant. null this strinulles uses the foundational nullRnullnullfnull ormula condemned artificial contraception.
you as boring, have a thought for me of ‘ancient common traditions, ’ nullut it was nulluite a dinullerent manuller
as nullsit writing this piece. How am null but declines to grasp the nenullle of when the nullnull nullambeth nullonference
to discover whence this nullomminullee circularity nullif a province repudiates ‘recognised the autonomy of each
has eruptednull nullt is not one of the what has hitherto been a common of its member churches to manulle its
four nullnstruments of nullommunion tradition, automaticanullly that tradition own decision’ on the ordination of
nullnullrchbishop of nullanterburynull ambeth ceases to be ‘common’ and thus loses women to the priesthood, and when
nullonferencenull nullnglican nullonsultative the nullnull nullonference resolved ‘nullat
nullomminulleenullnullrimates’ nulletingnull null it
tnull Bnullantnulle nullornull
each province renullect the decision
nullust a new name for the nulloint anull nding and anullitude of other provinces in the
nullomminullee of the nullrimates’ nulleting
onull nullnullnullnullntarnull
ordination of women in the episcopate. ’
and the nullnglican nullonsultative
and nullnstnullutnullnulle nullter-
nullose resolutions are now set in
nullouncilnull null it a close buddy of the
tenulluanulltnullnull nullnullnullonullnullnullnull
stone. nullt is useless, however logical
nullnternullnullnglican anull nding nullommission it may be, for nullnglican nullatholics to
on null s nullnullnity, nullaith and nullrdernull Annullnullnullnnullnullonullrates point out that, for them, a ‘woman
nullho nullnowsnull bishop’ is nullust as potent a focus of
nullut nullinullnulls clearly the way ahead in disunity as a homosenullual bishop is for
preserving the nullnity of the nullnglican any power to function as a refereenull nullvangelicals. nullambeth nullnull and nullnull
nullommunion. nullnder the nullovenant, it nullt tanullnulls about the ‘particular charism manulle it formanullly unacceptanulle, in the
is nullnullnullthat winulll anullempt to resolve and identity’ of nullnglicanism with not nullynullantine world of complementary
potentianullly communionnullbreanulling a nod at the nulluestion posed in his and constitutive internulltenulltuality by
disagreements and winulll bronuller nullnull nullnullocnullnullonulldnulls nullreface by nullanon which onullcial nullnglicanism operates,
the enullpulsion from enullectively funulll nullary nullennenullnullwhat is lenullof identity for our concerns to be classified as
membership in the nullommunion of if the nullommunion has abandoned communion breanulling.
provinces found nulluilty of being nonnull its ‘nullnglishness’ of stylenulldumped the
covenantnullcompliant. nullt winulll also bronuller unifying force of liturgy recognisanulle Tnull 39 Artnullnulls
the admission to funulll communion of in the nullrayer nulloonull traditionnull has nullt need hardly be said that our
nullrovinces not currently accepted as bishops who are focuses of disunity pronullems are actuanullly greater than
parts of that nullommunion. rather than unity, and theologians those entertained by nullvangelicals.
nullo, apnullarently, having eased who have abandoned the notion nullrticle nullnullnullnull manulles it clear that,
the nullmerican nullhurch out of the of living in a traditionnull nullhen the however reprehensinulle the personal
nullommunion, it could sponsor the nullovenant tanullnulls about being ‘mindful’ life of a minister might be considered,
admission of a ‘nullontinuing’ nullmerican of ecumenical agreements, does this this does not, according to nullnglican
body. nullis, rather divertingly, puts mean regarding them as determinant, principle, invalidate sacraments
nullnullnullon a similar level to that of the or only that, before discarding them, celebrated by him. nullhen nullishop
nullongregation for the nulloctrine of the we must thinnullup some senully reasons nullene Robinson says nullss, the nullody
nullaith, the nullatican dicastery which, for nullushing them awaynull and nulllood of nullhrist are indubitanully
under the provisions of the nullpostolic present and onullered in sacrifice. nullut
nullonstitution Anglicanonullum coetinullus, Tnull unnullntnullnabnull ‘bishopnullelect’ nulllasspool, even if she
winulll have the saynullso on adminulling nullut of course, for us in the nullnglican were the most rednullloodedly hetero
corporately groups of nullnglicans into nullatholic tradition, the unmentioned, gal imaginanulle, could never say a valid
funulll communion with the nullee of Rome. unmentionanulle, nulllephant in the Room nullss or confer Holy nullrder validly. nullt
is the nulluestion of the ordination is not her lifestyle but her gender that
Fnull ettnullnulltranulltnulln of women to the priesthood and creates, for us, the pronullem.
nullt would be easy to worry at tenulltual episcopate. nullere is a good reason nullis nullovenant has nothing
details in the nullovenant. nullts use of the why it is not mentioned. nulle nullnglican whatsoever for us.
word nullhurch can hardly apnulleal to elite operates on the basis that, once Anglicanonullum coetinullusnull ow, that’s a
nullrchbishop Rowan’s ecclesiologynullhe, something has been given away to dinullerent manuller.
ND
February 2010 
■
  newdirections 
■
  7
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40