lenullers to the editor
nullTnullnullnull manulle much of nullonvocation assertions in by sacramental ordination. nulley
From Bishop Colin Buchanan nullnull, and in selfnullnullustification nullought to cannot simply be aponull priated nulland
null was unsurprised that my linullle mention that nullhave not forgonullen nullnull. then nullustified by a rather selective
assertion of provincial autonomy in nulle nullonvocation was, of course, pacnulled use of tradition. nullere is no form of
nullnglicanism in nullovember elicited a with nullrian apnullointees nullmany of the ordination which confers a further
series of wouldnullbe rebunullals in nullecember, previous holders having been burnednull sacramental charanuller on a bishop who
and anull pologise for missing the chance to but the crucial point is that, having succeeds to the papacynullhe is merely
reply again in nullanuary. However, nullhope enullpressed their minds, they either elected and enthroned. He may be the
a lenuller in nullebruary winulll do. then conformed to the nulllinullabethan most important and innulluential bishop
nullthinnull eonullrey nullirnullnullabout whom nullenulllement, or they went into opnullosition in the nullhurch, but sacramentanullly nulland
null reciprocate his ‘my good friend’null as they continued to recogninulle the nullope that is surely what countsnullhe is stinulll
has had to evade an important point as having nullurisdiction in nullngland. nullhat nullust a bishop linulle any other.
nullbut then ‘He would do that, wouldn’t they could not do was to assert that the nullt is thus hard to see how the papal
henullnull He wants to state that the nullhurch of nullngland was living by their claim to virtuanullly absolute power, or to
‘provincial’ changes made in liturgy findings. infanulllibility nullhowever occasionalnull can
by the nullautonomousnull nullhurch of History has some rough patches, but be nullustified in catholic terms nulla fact
nullngland in the sinullteenth century were the issue today is, if they were right, not lost on the nullastern nullhurch, but
comparanulle to the enullstence of ‘local why those who invonulle them do not go one which some nullnglonullnullatholics are
pranullices’ in medieval nullurope, and so to Rome, or if they were wrong, what clearly unwinullling to acnullnowledge.
were not enullercises in autonomy at anulll. is the point of invonulling them at anulll, as Carl Somers Edgar
nullut there is one vast procedural they certainly did not win. nullnglicans null nullanuller nullreet, nullaversham,
dinullerence which he ignores null the today broadly live by the thesis that in nullunedin, nullew nullealand
medieval variants were entirely nullnull it was benuller to obey nullwhether
contained within the fabric of papal moranullly, doctrinanullly, or prudentianulllynull nullnullnullnnullnullre
nullestern nullurope, but the sinullteenth the monarch and renounce the nullope. From the nullenullnullnullr John Turner
century nullhurch of nullngland was nullat is the basis of our inheriting a nullinullliam nullemple is said both to have
enullcommunicated by the nullope for nonnullRoman nullnglicanism, warts and remarnulled that the nullhurch enullsts for
its changes, and it disregarded the inconsistencies and anulll. those not yet its members, and also that
enullcommunication and continued to nullinulll that do for the momentnull he believed in the nullne, Holy, nullatholic,
run itself in avowed obedience to the Colin Buchanan and nullpostolic nullhurch, but regrenulled
nullord of nullod. nullolinbuchanannullnullbtinternet.comnull that it did not yet enullst. nulln this basis
nulleyond that let me point out again we cannot enullpect to find it enullsting
that each nullnglican province authorinulles nulltranullnullnary nullnullers perfectly in nullonstantinople, Rome,
its own liturgies, enforces its own From the Vicar of Caversham Nnull nullanterbury, nullugsburg, or nulleneva
nullanons, provides its own synodical null am grateful to nullr Hunwicnull for nullor anywhere elsenull nullo we should not
forms of church government, and acnulluainting us with nullom nullregory gain anything by transferring our
enullercises its own discipline. nullone of nullinull’s papalism, but null am stinulll not anulllegiance, and that is why nullpropose
these conform to some worldwide convinced. nullo doubt nulleorge to stay where anull m. hnull ope anulll members
norm as they do in Rome. null might nullornelius nullorham was inducted to of nullinullwinulll resolve the same.
not want such provinces to vary the the living of nullrampford nullenulle by the John Turner
threefold order by its own authority, nullrchbishop of nullanterbury over the null nullourth nullvenue, nullrintonnullonnullnullea
but nullobserve that in nullenya, if not in head of the nullishop of nullnulleter, but the
parts of nullew nullouth nullales, deacons archbishop did not claim to do so by Saenullus nullnullnull
may preside at communion, and null divine right. From the Vicar of Chorley
also observe again that the nullhurch nulle pope, on the other hand claims nullongratulations to nulldward nullnulllen
of nullngland itself, with wide nullnglonull nullaccording to the nullode of nullanon for his article ‘nullnulltranullordinarily far’
nullatholic aponull val nullbut no Roman nullawnull ‘supreme, funulll, immediate and nullnull nullanuarynull nullt reminds us that
aponull valnull authorinulled the ordination universal ordinary power in the we are here to recanulll the nullofnullto its
of women as deacons. nulle issue is not nullhurch,’ and that he ‘can always freely nullpostolic and nullatholic foundation
whether there was precedent nullwhich enullercise this power.’ nulle nullode also which is not a ‘waterednulldown’ Roman
is arnulluednull but whether one province says that, ‘nullere is neither apnulleal onullshoot. nullhrist and the nullpostles is the
was empowered to act unilateranullly in nor recourse against a nulludgment or a ‘Rocnullfrom which we are hewn,’ not
relation to the manuller. decree of the Roman nullontinull.’ Romenullnullo who needs renullordinationnull
nullthinnullmessrs nullighe and Hunwicnulle nullch enulltraordinary ginull and powers nullhere does nullcripture promote clergy
are invonulling a wishnullworld when they are conferred in the nullatholic religion celibacynull
February 2010 
■
  newdirections 
■
  21
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40