This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LEADERSHIP π EDUCATION π OPPORTUNITY π SAFETY Accomplishments


Invested more than $100,000 in lacrosse-specifi c injury research. That fi gure will grow to more than $175,000 in 2014 as US Lacrosse continues to look at key issues such as reducing concussions.


Hired Bruce Griffi n as the organization’s fi rst full-time director of health and safety. He is responsible for coordinating US Lacrosse safety initiatives.


Adopted Standard for Athlete Safety and Protection, a policy that states that US Lacrosse will not tolerate physical or sexual abuse of a child. The policy gives clear cut steps of what to do in a suspected case and provides best practices for leagues to follow to avoid issues.


Conducted Sports Medicine Symposium at US Lacrosse National Convention to share pertinent information with coaches and medical personnel.


I


f he had any reason to doubt the impact of research, it was quickly blown away during the National Federation of State High School


Associations (NFHS) Rules Committee meeting for boys’ lacrosse. US Lacrosse presented data from a video research project that it had helped fund that showed blindside hits were one of the leading causes of concussions in boys’ lacrosse. The result? The NFHS Rules Committee added a defi nition that specifi cally called out hits on defenseless players as an illegal body check and increased the penalty for such hits to


a two- or three-minute non-releasable extra-man situation to help deter these


types of hits.


“We advocated that the NFHS look at defenseless hits, they saw the evidence and made the rule change,” said Bruce Griffi n, director of health and safety for US Lacrosse. “There was a direct correlation.” Since the formation of US Lacrosse,


safety has been a constant focus of the organization. US Lacrosse has a Sports Science and Safety Committee made up of some of the leading experts across multiple disciplines to guide the organization to make decisions in the best interest of the sport


and the athletes who play. Lacrosse-specifi c research is a valuable tool in helping the committee make recommendations. In 2013, US Lacrosse piloted a program geared towards reducing ACL injuries in the sport. Athletes involved in the program undergo a thorough warmup session with dynamic exercises to help strengthen their bodies before beginning play. The players completed a series of strength tests before and after the season to monitor their progress. The early returns were promising — no


players in the study suffered an ACL injury — but there is much work to be done. “The kids’ numbers were all stronger


and you would assume that makes them less likely to have an injury, but we don’t have a large enough sample size yet to see,” said Griffi n. “If we can create a lacrosse-specifi c ACL reduction program with proven results, that would be great for the sport. ACL injuries are the leading lost-time injury in lacrosse.” Increased funding is critical to


allowing the Sports Science and Safety Committee to expand its scope. “We’re starting phase one of a study


to see how coaches education effects player safety,” said Griffi n. “The initial proposal was for $50,000, but we were only able to fund $28,000 so we have to start small and just do a piece of what we want to do.” Learn more at uslacrosse.org/safety.


We advocated that the NFHS take a look at defenseless hits. They saw the evidence and made a rule change. There was a


direct correlation. –– BRUCE GRIFFIN


A Publication of US Lacrosse SAFETY


April 2014 >> LACROSSE MAGAZINE 73


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100