This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
John Lewis Partnership plc annual report and accounts 2013


Audit and Risk Committee Report continued


In recognition of that responsibility, the directors set policies and seek regular assurance that the systems of internal control are operating effectively. Strategic, commercial, operational, financial and health and safety risk areas are all included within the scope of these activities.


The systems of internal control are designed to manage, rather than seeking to eliminate, the risk inherent in pursuit of business objectives. In pursuing these objectives, internal controls can only provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. The Committee has recently reviewed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s systems of internal control for the accounting year covered by this report.


The Committee monitors the development of policies and systems for identifying, evaluating and managing significant risk throughout the Group. It also monitors management’s actions to manage those risks and reports regularly to the Partnership Board. The John Lewis, Waitrose, Partnership Services and Corporate divisions, include risk assessments as part of their business plans. The Partnership whistleblowing procedure is monitored by the Committee and allows Partners to raise, in confidence, any concerns about possible improprieties including matters of financial reporting, risk issues, fraud, internal controls and auditing issues.


Work performed by the Committee


 Apart from performing the routine tasks laid out in the Committee’s terms of reference, and the activities summarised above, the Committee has:


• reviewed the September 2012 half yearly report and the January 2013 annual report and accounts;


• reviewed and agreed the scope of the audit work to be undertaken by the internal and external auditors;


• agreed the fees to be paid to the external auditors for their audit of the January 2013 financial statements;


• overseen the strengthening and embedding of risk management procedures, as part of a continuous improvement programme. This follows a robust compliance risk identification, assessment and reporting analysis of significant risks faced by the Partnership;


• reviewed the measures for mitigating risks through appropriate internal controls and


•assurance mechanisms, and for developing risk analysis processes and methodology across the business;


• overseeing the development of the financial control and information technology environment for the Partnership and its divisions and considered improvements in the areas of financial control and information technology;


• reviewed and followed up with management on operational risks within the Partnership, in particular those relating to data security, business continuity and disaster recovery, the Olympic Games, profit protection, food safety, health and safety and various external threats;


• reviewed Waitrose’s compliance report with the Groceries (Supply Chain Practices) Market Investigation Order 2009 (‘the Order’) and the Groceries Supply Code of Practice (‘GSCoP’) and reviewed the report to be submitted to the Office of Fair Trading on 29 May 2013; and


• reviewed the output from whistleblowing arrangements.


The significant issues that the Committee considered and discussed in relation to the financial statements included: assumptions in relation to the retirement benefit obligations; provisions in relation to long leave, service guarantee costs, customer refunds, insurance claims, reorganisation costs and property related costs; liability for unredeemed gift vouchers; and impairment of assets. The Committee considers that the financial statements present these items on a fair and balanced basis.


Committee evaluation


Members of the Committee and regular attendees of the Committee’s meetings were provided with an opportunity, through an evaluation questionnaire, to comment on the effectiveness of the Committee. The outcome of the evaluation was reviewed by the Committee and showed a general consensus that the Committee was performing well.


As a result of its work during the year, the Committee has concluded that it has acted in accordance with its terms of reference and has reviewed the independence and objectivity of the external auditors.


On behalf of the Audit and Risk Committee


David Anderson


Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee


 


46

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100