Operation & Maintenance of Power Plants
Specifying linings for industrial kilns and furnaces
When specifying insulating materials for use as back-up lining in kilns and furnaces designers and specifiers must ensure their system delivers optimum long-term performance. Dave Barrington reports
Cuando utilice materiales específicamente aislados como forro de seguridad en hornos de secado, unidades de calefacción y especificadores, asegúrese de que su sistema proporciona un excelente rendimiento a largo plazo. Informa Dave Barrington.
Bei der Festlegung von Isolierstoffen als Auskleidung in Heiz- und Brennöfen müssen Konstrukteure und Planer sicherstellen, dass ihr System eine optimale Langzeitleistung liefert. Dave Barrington berichtet.
S
Fig. 1. Heat loss from a high temperature source such as a furnace is dominated by infra-red radiation.
electing the most effective insulation material for furnace applications is a key consideration and one that can deliver a major performance advantage and measurable
commercial return. When the impact of thermal conductivity on long-term cost and energy efficiency is taken into account, the benefits of an effective insulation material soon become apparent. A range of materials is available for the market, yet it can be difficult to understand the benefits of one material when compared to another. However, whatever insulation material is chosen, its key attribute should be low thermal conductivity, which will enable it to restrict the flow of heat from the furnace to the external environment. Heat loss from a high temperature source such as a furnace is dominated by infra-red radiation. Tis is blocked by the fibres contained in a fibrous insulation material. Te larger the number of fibres, the more effective the insulation will be. A superior insulation material will therefore have the best possible fibre index and contain a minimal number of ‘shot’ (unfibreised globular glass fibre) particles. Some materials on the market feature high shot content and coarse fibres, neither of which are beneficial for blocking high temperature thermal radiation. When specifying insulating materials for use as back-up lining in kilns and furnaces, which
have castable or brick forming the hot face, designers and specifiers must look beyond the initial purchase cost of the insulating materials to ensure their system will deliver optimum long- term performance and return on investment. Te main options for these applications are typically calcium cilicate or low biopersistent fibre-based boards.
Te compressive strength of Calcium Silicate might seem like a key benefit, and while it can endure heavy loads, its lack of flexibility does mean the material can be prone to cracking when put under certain strains that are difficult for the material to withstand. Fibre-based boards derive their strength from the interlinking of fibres during manufacture. Te more fibres that are available to link together, then the greater the strength and durability of the board. Te advantages to a board with high fibre count include easy installation and handling, excellent strength and resistance to cracking.
Testing thermal conductivity Low biopersistent fibre-based boards were introduced to the market in the mid 1990s. Te latest versions combine high-specification low biopersistent fibres, fillers and organic binders. Tese boards are engineered to maximise the content of insulating low biopersistent fibres by reducing the size and amount of ‘shot’, and so deliver significantly reduced thermal conductivity offering enhanced energy-saving properties. Recent tests carried out at the most common operating temperatures for furnace back-up board – between 600°C and 800°C – revealed that in the key area of thermal conductivity, the latest low biopersistent fibre-based board outperformed Calcium Silicate by an average of 20 per cent at 600°C and 15 per cent at 800°C. While Calcium Silicate typically costs less than low biopersistent fibre-based board, the wasted heat and associated energy costs more than outweigh the lower initial purchase cost. Te physical properties of the two materials should also be evaluated by specifiers. Calcium Silicate is brittle, making it prone to chipping, crumbling and breakage during transportation, handling and stacking. Tese issues are made worse during machining and installation.
24
www.engineerlive.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52