This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RETROFIT BUSINESS


Roo RTheetrofi tfi ng S T Game:he Framingystems


Figure 1


The “Post & Purlin” type framing works well with a fl at roof that has an open-web steel bar joist support system. (Drawing courtesy of McElroy Metal)


12 METAL CONSTRUCTION NEWS October 2012


many optional components that make it adaptable to the multitude of roof structures out there. For existing sloped roofs, there are several sub-framing assemblies that have been used, but only a few are code compliant, structurally correct systems, which I will explain later. Most of the retrofi t manufacturers have framing


systems that are very similar. Why? Because this is not rocket science and you cannot reinvent the wheel. Their differences are primarily in the way the framing is braced both transversely (eave to eave) and longitudinally (parallel to the new metal roof’s ridgeline). Some are easier to erect, but in the end they all make this very lightweight framing system extremely stable. Finally, once you begin to compare the new


roof’s geometry to the existing roof’s framing it be- comes clear when the various base system options come into play. This was discussed last month in our Fit-for-Use Applications column.


Now let’s discuss the correct framing system. By Mark James


Let’s say that your existing fl at roof has an open-web steel bar joist support system. This project will prob- ably be suited for “Post & Purlin” type framing (see Figure 1), understanding that the base members may or may not change from intermittent to continuous members based on the new roof geometry. However, if your new roof slope is perpendicu-


This month, we will discuss the different types of retrofi t framing systems that best suit a project. Once you have found that ideal opportunity


for retrofi tting an existing roof, you will probably al- ready have a pretty good idea what the new roof’s geometry will be. While this was the fi rst question, will you now know what the best-suited under structure will be to create the new roof geometry? For existing fl at roofs, there is basically one type of light-gauge steel framing system with


lar to the span direction of the bar joist and is prin- cipally gabled at both ends, then you may want to look at what we call a “Wide-Bay or Span” framing system (see Figure 2). Essentially a modifi ed Post & Purlin system, its value is in reducing the amount of framing to be erected and needs to attach to the existing roof system. Different from the Post & Purlin, this system has greater purlin spans and its vertical supports are located directly over the exist- ing primary supports, such as beams. This system is good as long as the purlins are


not spanning more than 20 to 25 feet. The only draw- back to this system is in its anchorage requirements where the required pull-out to be satisfi ed, can exceed four or fi ve times that of the Post & Purlin. As a point of interest, the two different framing systems have been combined many times for use


on the same project. The Wide-Bay design is usually ideal for existing glulam roof systems due to their having a structural wood decking in lieu of joists and the laminated beams are spaced less than 20 feet on-center. It could also apply to concrete and some heavy timber roofs as well. If your building is not a fl at roof, then you


have some options as well, but be cautious. For decades, the metal construction industry manu- facturers and contractors have been installing new metal roofs over asphalt shingles and other sloped roof assemblies including existing metal build- ing roofs (see Figure 3). Today, it is a little more diffi cult since most building code authorities have acquired jurisdiction over roof replacements. Even though some people may argue that replacing a roof falls under building maintenance, the permit- ting bodies don’t see it that way. The problem? You now have to have your new roof engineered to meet the local code’s regulated wind speeds and snow loads. This means a sub-framing sys- tem is engineered to accommodate the ASTM E-1592 wind uplift test results of the new metal roof, as well as supporting heavier adopted snow loads. It can get tricky, so consult with a manufac- turer that knows this business and can help you choose the right system. If you are just entering the retrofi t market,


there are several qualifi ed manufacturers that furnish the engineering, framing components and new metal roofi ng, which provide a complete package. The ones I know of are members of the Metal Construction Association (MCA), which in my opinion establishes them as a “player” in the retrofi t roofi ng game. Next month, we will discuss how retrofi t


systems can help existing buildings achieve energy independence.


Mark James has more than 40 years experience in the retrofi t and metal construction markets, work- ing for leading manufacturers and executing great projects. Currently, he is president of RetroSpec LLC, a consulting company offering direction and deep knowledge of the retrofi t business for manu- facturers and contractors. James can be reached at mark@retrospecllc.com.


Figure 2


The “Wide-Bay or Span” framing system works if the new roof slope is perpendicular to the span direction of the bar joist and gabled at both ends. (Drawing courtesy of McElroy Metal)


Figure 3


A new metal roof installed over existing shingle or metal-sloped roof. (Drawing courtesy of Roof Hugger)


www.metalconstructionnews.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136