This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Choosing a Hangar Door Getting the right type of door can make or break a hangar


Choosing a hangar door is a complicated process—from door type, price, aesthetics, ease of installation and maintenance re- quirements to strength, security and safety considerations—and making the wrong choice could lead to years of headache and thousands of dollars in additional costs. Door type remains one of the great debates


among aviators, and personal preference aside, hydraulic, bi-fold and fabric are the most common for hangar door applications. And there are distinct advantages and disadvantages to each type of door. Hydraulic doors provide a sleek, strong, effi -


cient design adaptable to a wide variety of fi nishes. Held down by the hydraulic rams, hydraulic doors deliver added stability and security when in the closed position and seal nicely from the elements. Because of the single-panel design, there is a clearance requirement to accommodate opening/ closing of any single-panel hydraulic door. The bi-fold design is well known in the aviation


industry and has been around for a very long time. Once basically just a utility door found on smaller hangars and t-hangars, the bi-fold door and has come a long way in terms of design and aesthetics. While requiring more headroom than a hydraulic door, the bi- fold requires less operating room in front of the door. Found primarily on larger aircraft hangar


doors, the vertical lifting fabric door is almost un-


limited in size and confi guration options as it can be divided into several sections. Like the hydraulic door, the fabric door requires minimal headroom, but can easily be penetrated which presents some security risk. Advances are being made on all door types,


across the door market, making your options better and your choices easier. One example is Minneota, Minn.-based ICON Door Systems, who has intro- duced signifi cant innovations in the ease of installa- tion, strength and safety of overhead doors. “ICON Door Systems has taken the approach


of talking to builders, contractors and door own- ers in the market and analyzing each step in the decision-making process and working to innovate accordingly,” states Stan Robinson, president of ICON Door Systems. Using the concept of the cost-effective, ef-


fi cient, single-panel hydraulic door as its foundation, ICON fi rst addressed the needs of the builder/con- tractor with the introduction of the ICON Knuckle Splice Connection. The Knuckle’s taper-lock design requires no


welding for standard doors under 90 feet (exclud- ing steel building attachment points) and pre-aligns the member, completely eliminating the time-con- suming step of re-aligning the door when hanging. “In most cases a 60-foot door can be installed in under three hours,” adds Robinson. “In fact, we


recently had a 120-foot door assembled and ready to be installed in less than 90 minutes!” The ICON Knuckle signifi cantly adds strength


to the door as well. Unlike the bolted joint method, the Knuckle delivers the same structural integrity as a solid piece of steel, while demanding virtually no additional load to the hardware. And once the taper-lock design of the Knuckle Joint is bolted to- gether it allows the members to be calculated as a single piece, eliminating consideration for the split, which can greatly impact wind load ratings. For the end user, there are innovations on the


safety front as well. The majority of hydraulic doors utilize a hydraulic pilot to control the fl ow of fl uid at the pump station. The ICON Safety Block was engineered for additional safety as it controls and regulates hydraulic pressure ensuring door stability. As Robinson describes: “What makes the ICON Safety Block different from methods used by other doors is that it only allows hydraulic line pressure during door operation, releasing it into the reservoir tank when the door is not in motion. This eliminates pressure on the lines that can fl uctuate greatly with temperature shifts causing rupture, and greatly reduces any risk of leak- age in the unlikely even that a breach should occur.”


Sheri Carr is the director of marketing for ICON Door Systems, Minneota, Minn. For more informa- tion, visit www.icondoors.com.


By Sheri Carr


This 122-foot ICON Hangar Door was assembled and ready for install in less than 90 minutes.


www.metalconstructionnews.com


The ICON Knuckle Splice Joint delivers the same structural integrity as a solid piece of steel.


circle #14 on reader service card October 2012 METAL CONSTRUCTION NEWS 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136