This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
METALS COST INFLATION


Despite these ‘barriers to exit’ however, we would


Figure 1: Cost Curve Dynamic – Slope Comparison 250


Nickel 150 50 -50 Lead -150 -250


Aluminium Gold


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 Source: Deutsche Bank


of marginal capacity augments this inflationary trend. Cost control represents the single


most important value-added strategy for managers. Improved anticipation of geographic risks and opportunities, the use of hedging tools, backward integration, and a focus on quality assets represent the most effective ways to meet this challenge. Accordingly, we believe that the metals with the greatest future cost pressure include nickel, copper and iron ore.


Costs & Price Determination Commodity analysis is based on


the notion that supply response is, in large part, price sensitive. As prices decline sufficiently to push the profit margins of higher-cost supply into negative territory it would be expected that this supply adjust by minimising losses and shutting down. Certainly there are various considerations for a shut-down decision: 1) The cost to idle/suspend operations,


2) The volatility of the commodity – it would be embarrassing for the manager to idle production only to see prices rebound,


3) Contractual obligations (input & output) and,


4) Political interference. 66 June 2012 0 10 20 30 40 50


IronOre Copper Zinc


expect that under normal circumstances markets will adjust to deteriorating economics; whereby supply contracts to meet or exceed the implied contraction in demand (implied by the falling price). On this basis an analysis of the industry cost curve can be helpful in determining value for a specific commodity; particularly when the price reflects a demand contraction which may be excessive when compared to the likely actual demand situation. The slope of the cost curve can be of considerable


significance in helping to determine the probable response of supply in a weakening price environment. We would assert that the greater the slope the greater the likely supply response. Our reasoning is the following: as prices decline high cost producer margins move quickly negative, but more importantly margin erosion occurs rapidly vs. other peer producers. If high cost production resists closure, margin pressure remains relentless and prices continue to fall eventually forcing a capitulation. Critical to this is the relative isolation


of high cost capacity, as differentiated from peer producers. This contrasts with industry curves which are relatively flat. As prices fall there is little response until prices fall sufficiently to capture a considerable swathe of capacity. At this point there is, in our view, a kind of brinksmanship, whereby producers try to outlast each other as margin pressure grows. Moreover, the delayed response by supply in a flat cost environment means prices can stay low for longer than would be expected.


... we expect that political interference could be an increasingly important variable in preventing the normal supply response


Figure 1 compares the slopes of various selected metals/


materials markets together. In this exercise we compared the relationship between the 20th


percentile and the 80th percentile


on the cost curve and then compared across metals markets. On this basis (all else being equal) we believe that the nickel market followed by iron ore should be the most responsive to falling prices. At the other end, aluminium and gold could be expected to be rather unresponsive or exhibit a more sluggish producer response as conditions deteriorate.


Geography The New Tax: ‘Keep Operating’ Operating conditions are often considerably more complicated


than our analysis above suggests. In fact in the current stressed economic environment we expect that political interference could be an increasingly important variable in preventing the normal supply response that one would expect if price conditions were to deteriorate. We see the resulting non-responsive nature of supply to lower prices as a kind of tax that government applies to industry (although one could argue that this loss in value is simply transferred to the consumer – zero sum).


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96