MERCHANDISER
Mining M&A Appetite on the Up
A NEW SURVEY published by Clifford Chance has identified the top drivers and risks for M&A across an increasingly complex global mining landscape. More than half (57%) of mining and metals sector
respondents to Cross-border M&A: Perspectives on a changing world are expecting current cross-border M&A activity levels to be maintained or increased over the next two years. Some 70% of sector respondents expect to focus on strengthening their core business rather than diversifying into new areas and, accordingly perhaps, the great majority (59%) expect to see some disposal of assets in response to tax, regulatory and political risks. The research, which was conducted by the Economist
Intelligent Unit on Clifford Chance’s behalf surveyed nearly 400 companies with annual revenues in excess of US$1 billion from across a range of regions and industry sectors, including the mining and metals sector. The survey also revealed that 55% of mining and metals
companies are focusing their M&A strategy on high- growth economies, rather than domestic (28%) or global developed markets (17%).
deals – a higher figure than any other sector.
• Minority investment in a local company is, overwhelmingly, the most popular deal structure. For
buyers, this manages exposures to operational and regulatory risks as well as overcome merger control issues. For sellers, minority stakes can be sold to raise funds for projects while maintaining overall control.
• Cash is not necessarily king: Acquisition activity is less likely to be funded by cash than in other sectors.
Cash is preferred by only 16% of mining respondents against an average of 37% across all sectors, despite many miners having record cash inflows from increased production and high commodity prices. Acquirers are willing to consider a range of funding sources.
• Sovereign wealth funds are the most important finance source for the mining and metals sector
according to 32% of respondents (up from 22% two years ago), the highest level across all sectors, and a sign of the strategic importance of commodity supply to developing economies.
A number of significant themes in the mining and metals sector emerge from the survey findings:
• Shareholder pressure was a frequently identified driver behind sales in the sector (cited by 32% of mining respondents). Despite record income from historically high commodity prices, many mining companies have significant funding pressures because of record capital expenditure commitments. Shareholders are increasingly concerned about the impact of project spend on earnings and there is mounting pressure for companies to respond by selling non-core and costly assets.
• Cultural integration issues emerged as a more prominent barrier to M&A activity (for 24% of mining
respondents). Additionally, some 67% of mining respondents agree that concerns about cultural differences are a deterrent to pursuing cross-border
20 June 2012
David Lewis, Co-head of Mining and Metals said, “The
energy, mining and utilities sector has been the most active sector by value in 2011 with some US$557.1 bn in announced deals, up 3.6% from 2010. This buoyant market was fuelled in part by the Asian superpowers’ continued fight for natural resources and assets becoming available at reasonable prices. “While the frenzy may have slowed, we see that continued
strong demand for natural resources, with particular focus on the untapped resources of less well-developed regions such as Africa, and shareholder pressure to focus on core assets, will still drive deal flow in the sector.” Separately, continued volatility is having an impact on
the level of mining and metals sector M&A activity, but a strong pipeline indicates miners are showing an appetite to do deals, according to Ernst & Young’s Global Mining & Metals Transaction Leader, Lee Downham.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96