Technology update Rediscovering alginate dressings
removal from the wound. G-rich alginates will only swell slightly during use and can be removed as an intact dressing, while dressings high in M alginates will swell to a greater extent and dissolve, allowing them to be removed through irrigation. Alginates can be used in a variety of wound
types where exudate is present, including: Pressure ulcers Venous leg ulcers Diabetic foot ulcers Post-operative wounds Cavity wounds Traumatic wounds Malignant wounds Pilonidal sinus wounds Donor sites Partial thickness burns [6-12]
. Generally, alginate dressings can be left
in place for 5–7 days. However, the dressing should be changed when it has reached its capacity for absorbing wound exudate. This is normally indicated by ‘strike through’ of fluid to the secondary dressing. In the case of infected wounds, daily inspection of the wound bed may be required. If the saturated alginate overlaps onto
the periwound skin it can cause maceration, therefore, clinicians should cut the alginate to the shape of the wound and apply a periwound skin protectant (such as a no-sting barrier film). Some alginate manufacturers recommend placing the dressing over the wound and the periwound skin with no requirement to cut the dressing to shape[5]
it should be removed once haemostasis has been achieved, otherwise the blood-soaked dressing will dry out and adhere to the wound bed making removal difficult and potentially painful for the patient. Alginate dressings are not recommended as a treatment for wounds that are bleeding heavily. These require alternative methods to achieve haemostasis, such as diathermy and cautery.
SILVER IN ALGINATE DRESSINGS Alginate dressings have been combined with other materials, for example, carboxymethylcellulose, zinc and silver[4]
. There
has been considerable interest in combining silver and alginate dressings since the addition of silver results in increased antimicrobial activity when tested in laboratory conditions[14-16]
. This
would suggest that the alginate dressings containing silver may be suitable for infected wounds. However, they should be used according to general best practice guidance for antimicrobial dressings[17]
, which states that for
the majority of patients, the initial prescription should normally be for 14 days with a formal review of treatment objectives at around seven days. A review should be conducted at each dressing change by a qualified clinician, and no prescription should extend beyond 14 days without discussion with a local specialist unless previously agreed or indicated by clinical need.
— if
in doubt, the clinician should always follow the manufacturer's instructions. As the volume of exudate reduces there is always the potential for the alginate to adhere to the wound bed if not saturated with wound fluid. In these situations the alginate should be moistened prior to removal and an alternative dressing used to achieve moisture balance at the wound bed.
FLUID-HANDLING PROPERTIES Absorbency should be reported as fluid uptake per standard dressing area (100cm2
) rather
than by dressing weight, given that dressings are supplied in a standard size rather than by their weight[13]
of alginate dressings may range[1] grams/100cm2
. On this basis, the absorbency from 16.16 with
to 24.7 grams/100cm2
absorbency also reduced where compression bandages are used[1]
(compressed dressings
have less capacity for fluid uptake, probably due to changes in their physical shape). If the alginate is used to control bleeding
RELEVANT LITERATURE Thomas[1]
provides an excellent review of
the use of alginate dressings (along with a wide range of other dressing materials) and this source should be considered as a basic introduction to the use and evaluation of wound dressings. The commercial production and basic
chemistry of alginic acid and the alginates has also been discussed in depth by McHugh [3]
, while
two recent Cochrane reviews detailed the role of alginate dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers [18–19]
. Given the paucity of randomised
controlled trials that have compared alginates (and other wound dressings), neither review was able to reach a definitive conclusion regarding the value of alginate dressings in diabetic foot ulcer care, with one stating that: 'Currently, there is no research evidence to suggest that alginate wound dressings are more effective in healing foot ulcers in people with diabetes than other types of dressing, however, many trials in this field are very small.'
References
9. Clark R, Bradbury S. Silvercel Non-Adherent Made Easy.Wounds Int 2010; 1(5): 1–6.
10. Harris CL, Holloway S. Development of an evidence- based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive Delphi procedure. Part 2: methodology, analysis and results. Int Wound J 2012; 9(2): 173–188.
11. Higgins L, Wasiak J, Spinks A, Cleland H. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate dressings. Int Wound J 2012; 9(2):126–131.
www.woundsinternational.com
27
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57