This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LICENSING CHALLENGES


The litigation resulted in an order issued by the circuit court, finding that the Taiwanese defendant was properly Hague


served under convention, the and that by filing the motion to dismiss, it had submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the court. Even though


that particular motion to dismiss was later stricken, and the defendant in Taiwan and its US subsidiary were ordered to file an answer, both defendants failed to file a response or appear in court and were, therefore, found to be in default. A letter submitted to the court by the Taiwanese defendant


failed to meet


the standards of a legally sufficient answer or pleading. The defendant was ordered to pay a seven-digit dollar amount. This judgment was not appealed by the defendant.


Daniel Papst graduated from the University of Karlsruhe/Germany in electrical engineering and information technology in 2000, earning a Dipl. Ing., and has been a licensed German patent attorney since 2005. He joined Papst Licensing operatively in 2005, is a member of VPP, LES and IEEE, and is an INTIPSA fellow.


The question arises of how exactly the plaintiff was able to substantiate damages satisfactorily with the court. Particular sales amounts had been provided to the licensor orally during meetings with the licensee in Taiwan. It was then possible to establish, affidavits,


that provided to the sales numbers licensor


through witness had


been (plaintiff). This


turned out to be sufficient proof for the court to assess damages.


With investigator,


information it


acquired turned out that by a private the Taiwanese


brushless DC fan manufacturer had not only closed its US subsidiary but had even shiſted its import channel from a US West Coast city to a


port in Canada. Te verdict had to be enforced in Taiwan, since all US assets seemed to have disappeared. With the help of a local Taiwanese attorney, it was possible successfully to enforce the US court order in Taiwan, against Taiwanese defendant.


the


In the end, persistence in gathering information paid off and it was possible the


to track down licensee and prove its underreporting.


Alongside an experienced US patent attorney, the local Taiwanese attorney and local auditors in Taiwan helped the


licensor to establish


proof of underpayment with an enforceable verdict providing a substantial financial return. Anyone involved in licensing in South East Asia, especially Taiwan, would be well advised to consider similar steps for enforcing a licensing agreement. n


n Daniel Papst is a patent attorney managing director and co-owner and of Papst


Licensing GmbH & Co. He can be contacted at: daniel.papst@papstlicensing.com


www.worldipreview.com


World Intellectual Property Review Annual 2012


27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180