This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Towards a green economy Scenario


NCAR with developing-country investments Agricultural research Irrigation expansion Irrigation efficiency


Rural roads (area expansion) Rural roads (yield increase) Total


CSIRO with developing-country investments Agricultural research Irrigation expansion Irrigation efficiency


Rural roads (area expansion) Rural roads (yield increase) Total


South Asia


172 344 999 8 9


1,531


185 344


1,006 16 13


1,565


East Asia and the Pacific


151 15


686 73 9


934


172 1


648 147 9


977


Europe and Central Asia


84 6


99 0


10 198


110 1


101 0


11 222


Latin America and the


Caribbean


426 31


129 573 3


1,162


392 30


128 763 3


1,315


Middle East and North Africa


169 –26 59 37 1


241


190 –22 58 44 1


271 fertilisation effect.


Sub-Saharan Africa


314 537 187


1,980 35


3,053


326 529 186


1,911 36


2,987


Table 6: Incremental annual agricultural investment figures by region needed to counteract climate- change impacts on child malnutrition17 Note: These results are based on crop model yield changes that do not include the CO2


Source: Nelson et al. (2009)


enable these countries to purchase technology and other critical inputs for their economies.


Climate adaptation and mitigation benefits, and ecosystem services Making agriculture more resilient to drought, heavy rainfall events, and temperature changes is closely linked to building greater farm biodiversity and improved soil organic matter. Practices that enhance biodiversity allow farms to mimic natural ecological processes, enabling them to better respond to change and reduce risk. The use of intra and inter-species diversity serves as an insurance against future environmental changes by increasing the system’s adaptive capabilities (Ensor 2009). Improved soil organic matter from the use of green manures, mulching, and recycling of crop residues and animal manure increases the water holding capacity of soils and their ability to absorb water during torrential rains.


The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) estimates that an additional US$ 7.1-7.3 billion per year are needed in agricultural investments to offset the negative impact of climate change on nutrition for children by 2050 (Table 6). The International Food Policy Research Institute recommended investments were needed primarily for basic infrastructure such as rural roads in Africa and expanded irrigation, and


17. Note: 1) NCAR: The National Center for Atmospheric Research (US); 2) CSIRO: The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia).


60


for agricultural research (Nelson et al. 2009). However, assessments of green investment options that would include agro-ecological soil fertility enhancement; water-use efficiency improvements for rain-fed farming; breeding for drought and flood tolerance; integrated pest management; and post harvest handling infrastructures, still remain to be done.


The IPCC estimates that the global technical mitigation potential from agriculture by 2030 is approximately 5,500-6,000 Mt CO2


Developing countries


1,316 907


2,158 2,671 66


7,118


1,373 882


2,128 2,881 74


7,338


-eq/yr (Smith et al. 2007). Soil carbon


sequestration would be the mechanism responsible for most of this mitigation, contributing 89 per cent of the technical potential. Therefore, agriculture has the potential to significantly reduce its GHG emissions, and possibly to function as a net carbon sink within the next 50 years. The most important opportunity for GHG mitigation is the application of carbon-rich organic matter (humus) into the soil. This would significantly reduce the need for fossil fuel-based and energy- intensive mineral fertilisers and be a cost-effective means of sequestering atmospheric carbon. Further GHG mitigation gains could be achieved by improving yields on currently farmed lands and reducing deforestation pressures and by adopting no/low tillage practices that reduce fuel usage (Bellarby et al. 2008; ITC andFiBL 2007; Ziesemer 2007).


The environmental services provided by greening farms are substantial. The Rodale Institute, for example, has


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45