| research report | ARTICLE
In referring to the classic model which describes a number
of phases of the wound healing process (Figure 7), it is clear that the measurements taken within 3 weeks of treatment indicate the inflammatory phase. It may be that improvement of dermal hydration, perhaps by osmotic effect, results in a minor loss of hydration of the stratum corneum. as a control, two individuals underwent the same
treatment regimen, but with saline rather than prp. these individuals experienced the same injection treatments. therefore, the results of their treatment served as an objective test with regard to the effect of prp compared with skin injected with plasma or other non-platelet containing solutions. the control group correlated well with effects attributable to inflammation and did not vary significantly from the experimental group, with the exception of decreased hydration. Based on the initial results, an in-depth cross-analysis of results was conducted.
Descriptive statistics for the samples T-test for significance of group size age repartition shows a symmetric distribution with an average of 49.8 (Figure 8); while anisotropy repartition shows a symmetric distribution with an average of 28.9 (Figure 9). this demonstrates that the size of the groups chosen is statistically acceptable and is representative of the general female population within the chosen age group.
Predictive values for the success of the treatment the average anisotropy rate in the study group was -24.1%. In order to find predictive values for the success of this treatment, the study population was divided into two groups. the first division was based on age, and the second on initial anisotropy.
www.aestheticgroup.fr email:
laboinex@wanadoo.fr
ZA La Gobette • 60540 Puiseux le Hauberger • France Tel : 33 (0) 3 44 74 19 95 • Fax : 33 (0) 3 44 74 18 94
Liposuction • Lipo sculpture • Lipo-filling • Lipolysis • Filler injections • Mesotherapy
prime-journal.com | November/December 2011 ❚ INEX- The Cannula SPECIALIST
37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84