This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2008, vol. 222(12): pp. 2427-2431.


22. Gill, S.S. and Kaplas, M. “Comparative Study of 3D Printing Technologies for Rapid Casting of Aluminium Alloy,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2009, vol. 24(12): pp. 1405–1411.


23. Singh, J.P. and Singh, R., “Investigations for a Statistically Controlled Rapid Casting Solution of Lead Alloys Using Three-dimensional Printing,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2009, vol. 223(9): pp. 2125-2134.


24. Hegde, S. and Prabhu, K.N., “Modification of Eutectic Silicon in Al–Si Alloys,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 43(9) pp. 3009–3027 (2008).


25. Fatahalla, N., Hafiz, M., and Abdulkhalek, M., “Effect of Microstructure on the Mechanical Properties and Fracture of Commercial Hypoeutectic Al-Si Alloy Modified with Na, Sb and Sr,” Journal of Materials


technical Review & discussion


Rapid Casting of Light Metals: an experimental investigation Using taguchi Methods S. Singamneni, O. Diegel, D. Singh and N. McKenna, School of Engineering, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand


Reviewer: The choice of material is not a true variable for metalcasting and is likely predetermined by the application.


Authors: Most of reviewer’s comments on the choice of differ- ent casting alloy grades in the current experimental investiga- tions are valid and represent true concerns. It is agreed that considering the cast alloy as a variable is not a valid experi- mental factor, provided the overall aim of the experiment is to find optimum combinations of all experimental factors, for the best values of specific responses. However, the main objective of the current experimental plan is to establish the validity of a relatively new casting technique for light metals processing under varying conditions. While mould materials, coatings and pouring temperature are the true variable factors, different al- loys are included to simultaneously experience the process per- formance over a range of light metals. This approach, together with the use of Taguchi L9 design allowed rather economically, some preliminary experiences with using rapid prototyped moulds for different light metals casting. The experiment is not to find the optimum factor combinations for the best strength or other properties, but to establish, if essential characteristics with any of the alloys tested are lost due to any inherent weak- nesses of the process, as yet unknown.


Reviewer: The statistical analyses presented for UTS and elongation are a serious concern. It is not really appropri- ate to conduct an analysis of this type with different alloys.


36


Science, vol. 34, pp. 3555–3564 (1999).


26. Wang, Q.G., “Microstructural Effects on the Tensile and Fracture Behaviour of Aluminum Casting Alloys A356/357,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 34(12). pp. 2887-2899 (2007).


27. Taylor, J.A., “The Effect of Iron in Al-Si Casting Alloys,” 35th Australian Foundry Institute National Conference, Australian Foundry Institute (AFI): Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 148-157 (2004).


28. Bettles, C.J., Gibson, M.A. and Zhu, S.M., “Microstructure and Mechanical Behaviour of an Elevated Temperature Mg-Rare Earth Based Alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 505 (1-2), pp. 1-12 (2009).


29. Brown, J.R., “Foseco Non-Ferrous Foundryman’s Handbook,” Butterworth-Heinemann (1999).


30. Roy, R., “A Primer on the Taguchi Method,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers (1990).


31. Ross, P.J., “Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering,” The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. (1996).


It also appears that metallurgical factors important for cast- ing quality were over looked. The authors concluded that; “Overall, the combination of unmodified eutectic silicon, porosity and Fe inclusion led to the brittle fracture and poor strength of the aluminum specimens, indicating a poor melt quality rather than the ability of the RP process.” What then, was the purpose of the preceding statistical analysis?


Authors: The overall objective is to experimentally inves- tigate the effectiveness of RP moulds for casting selected light metals. A separate set of experiments could have been conducted for each alloy system, considering variation of selected process parameters. As the total number of experi- ments in that case is high, and considering that these are initial trials to get an overall impression of the performance of the moulds, cast metals are included in the parameter set of a Taguchi L9 experimental design, from time and cost considerations. The statistical analysis on mechanical prop- erties is conducted mainly to find if castings of any alloys considered produced inferior properties compared to their traditionally cast counter parts. While both alloy grades of magnesium showed no loss of properties, the aluminium alloy castings exhibited relatively poor mechanical proper- ties. The metallurgical factors are considered as much as possible, and the aluminium melt was lance degassed, be- fore introducing into the moulds, however, there were some practical difficulties due to insufficient facilities. This was reflected in the results of the post-mortem analysis on the aluminium castings, which revealed issues such as iron con- tamination and hydrogen porosity and hence the conclusion that it was due to these practical problems, aluminium cast- ings did not fare well, but not due to any inherent inabilities of RP moulds. Further experiments with aluminium casting using ZP 131 moulds under controlled conditions revealed much better casting characteristics.


International Journal of Metalcasting/Summer 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75