This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
strength models revealed that no significant differences exist between the two tested ZCorp materials, and ZP131 seems to be more rigid and much better in terms of the definition of the mould faces and edges. Also, the plaster gives a better surface finish, which was clearly evident from the initial casting trials. Based on all of these con- siderations, it was understood that both materials equally qualify as mould materials, and the following experimen- tal evaluation of the system includes these two as possi- ble experimental factors. The optimum mould processing conditions being already established, the next stage is to produce cast specimens using rapid prototyped moulds of optimum properties and subsequently conduct mechani- cal testing and micro structural examination to establish the overall suitability of these moulds to process light al- loys and produce adequate castings.


experimental design and Methodology


The experimental design considers three significant factors, mould material, pouring temperature and mould coating, while three alloys are considered for casting. The approach is to establish the variation of responses such as tensile strength, surface roughness and microstructural appearance, as these factors are simultaneously varied at different lev- els, within the selected ranges. However, three of the four factors being qualitative in nature, traditional factorial ex- perimental designs were avoided. The Taguchi L9 orthogo- nal array was finally chosen and each factor was varied at three different levels. This design allowed consideration of three different levels for each of the factors. While the two Zcast materials discussed in the previous section are com- bined with a traditional foundry sand to constitute the mould


Table 1. Taguchi L9 Experimental Design


Table 2. Compositions of Alloys Considered


28


International Journal of Metalcasting/Summer 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75