CFI: News Review
One hell of a first half for short-term market
into the market, has also con- tributed to activity levels. indeed, there are now
by Yousouf Roze, director, First 4 Bridging
So, how did the bridging market fare in the first half of 2011 — and what devel- opments did we see in the sector generally? Well, to cut a long story short, it was one hell of an H1 in terms of both lending and corporate activ- ity.
although it started fairly
quietly, after a frenzied last quarter of 2010, by February and march activity levels had really picked up. Why? rising investor con-
fidence has certainly played a role but heated competi- tion among the lenders, com- pounded by new entrants
some fantastic rates in the short-term market, while loan to values have also edged up. there’s a real bat- tle among the lenders and the ultimate winner will al- ways be the borrower. But as well as being forced
to be more competitive, lend- ers have become more confi- dent generally. Partly this is because they
feel that the property market is unlikely to fold any time soon. a sideways moving property market is the overall consensus. nobody, barring the doom-mongers, expects further double digit falls. But this confidence is also
to do with the fact that most observers now expect Bank rate to stay either at its cur-
rent level or sub 1% for at least the next 12-18 months given the ongoing weakness of the economy. as long as the property market stays in the limbo it is currently in, that’s good enough for a lender. You could also say that
lenders, like most other busi- nesses in other sectors, have now got used to the market and economy. everyone has been operating in the shad- ow of economic uncertainty for nearly four years now and it’s time to move on. in the prime areas of the
capital, competition is espe- cially intense. Lenders are al- most falling over each other to get a slice of the action, even stretching LtVs to get the deal. right now, borrowers with the right credit history, equity
and track record are really in the driving position if they’re looking to secure against a high net worth asset in prime London. We’re currently helping
one such client secure funds for a development in one of the more sought-after areas of the capital and he’s not go- ing to have much of a prob- lem securing a very attractive rate on very attractive terms. Looking forward, in the
second half of 2011 we don’t expect a significant amount of change overall on the rate or product front, as the lend- ers may well be spent after a frantic first half, but who knows? the bridging sector has
thrown up no end of surpris- es during the first half of the year and the second could well be the same.
Short-term rate slashing unsustainable long-term
by Ed McAra, underwriting manager, Omni Capital
there’s nothing wrong with a bit of healthy competition they say. during the boom of the
sub-prime lending industry of the late 1990s and early 2000s, bridging finance had always remained a relatively niche product and was regarded by many as something of a cot- tage industry within the wider lending market. Whilst sub-prime lend-
ers have been and gone, the bridging market has stood its
ground. despite the overnight disappearance of many of the exits once provided by sub- prime and buy-to-let lenders the majority of bridging lend- ers managed to survive to tell the tale. Surprisingly, for what is still
considered a niche market, competition within the bridg- ing market is now probably greater than ever. the vast majority of the established lenders remain and have been joined by a number of new entrants over the past couple of years and it seems that a week doesn’t pass by without a new lender appearing in the trade press. When you consider that very few borrowers set out
looking specifically for bridg- ing finance, it is clear that the lack of liquidity and access to secure funding has made bridging finance such a strong proposition in today’s restrict- ed market. although strong compe-
tition may not be ideal for lenders, impacting on market share, margins and ultimately profitability, it can only be seen as a positive thing for brokers and borrowers alike, who are well placed to take advantage of the improved products that are becoming increasingly available. as lenders continue to com-
pete for market share, their margins are being eroded by the slashing of rates and con-
tinually inflating introducer fees and incentives to brokers at a time when the cost of funding isn’t cheap. Having seen a similar situ-
ation in the sub-prime sector previously, you cannot help but wonder how sustainable this is and ultimately if all of the current lenders will sur- vive if this practice continues. Whilst some of the smaller
family lenders are happy to continue to lend on a small- er scale, this may not be the case for a number of the big- ger players. if prices cannot continue to be driven down further, many lenders will have to look at other ways of increasing their market share.
mortgage introducer JULY 2011 55
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64