This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
54 Feature/Bricks & Blocks


HOUSEBUILDING TARGETS: Thin Joint Technique Can Help, Says Hanson


THE THIN JOINT SYSTEM OF MASONRY CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN USED IN MAINLAND EUROPE FOR THE PAST THREE DECADES BUT HAS ONLY APPEARED ON UK BUILDING SITES OVER THE LAST DECADE AND IS STILL NOT YET IN WIDESPREAD USE ALTHOUGH IT CONTINUES TO FIND FAVOUR WITH A GROWING NUMBER OF BUILDING CONTRACTORS.


Hanson Building Products is a leading proponent of the thin joint system using Thermalite Thin Mortar r and Aircrete blocks.


The advantages claimed for this method of construction cover speed, accuracy, reduced waste, cost effectiveness and, in an industry increasingly dominated by rigorous energy-saving requirements, a contribution to reducing heat lost through the building envelope.


This sounds impressive for a system that uses a pre-mixed cement-based mortar that is mixed in a bucket. Just add to water and stir. Thin joint is in fact the only method of on-site build involving masonry now recognised as a modern method of construction or MMC. As the name confirms, thin joint reduces the thickness of the mortar course between blocks to a minimum. A traditional sand and cement joint is 10mm whereas thin joint does the job with a depth of just 3mm. The consistency of the joint is determined by use of a purpose-designed serrated scoop applicator.. For longer runs of blockwork a pumped system of application is available to further enhance speed of build. Just how fast is the process? An independent test


commissioned by Thermalite and carried out by chartered surveyors Percy Howes concluded that thin joint blockwork can be laid twice as fast as the traditional sand and cement method. Speed trials on 6m lengths of wall with a return, found Thermalite Shield blocks and general purpose mortar taking 302 minutes and 30 seconds to lay while the same type of block laid with thin layer mortar clocked up just 146 minutes and 20 seconds. So as to eliminate the all-to-inconsistent human element, the same brickie laid the blocks in all cases.


The tests recorded a laying rate of 9.72m2/hour when using the traditional method against 20.66m2/hour using the thin joint system. The area laid can be enhanced still further if the builder uses Thermalite’s Large Format Blocks which have a face size equal to two traditional blocks. Typically, walls constructed using Thermalite blocks and thin layer mortar will be stable after 60 minutes. This allows the amount of walling that can be built to be increased allowing the early installation of other components, such as floors and roof timbers.


In monitoring the tests Percy Howes also noted that areas surrounding the work were “significantly cleaner.” With the thin joint system there was “No mortar build up at the base of the panels, unlike the panels where traditional mortar had been utilised.”


By reducing the amount of mortar in any given area of wall by at least 70%, compared to a general purpose mortar joint, heat loss through the mortar joints is also reduced. An improvement in U-Values of up to 10% can be achieved using Hanson’s Thermalite Thin Joint System.


Walls built with thin layer mortar also offer increased air tightness of the construction which reduces the amount of ventilation heat loss through the building fabric. Independent tests carried out by the Building Services Research and Information Association (BSRIA) gave air tightness results for Thermalite 100mm blockwork and Thermalite Thin Layer Mortar of better than 0.10m3/hm2, the lowest possible score.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76