Code 27 Key Issues for the Builder or Developer
Much of the CSH concerns itself with fairly routine matters but there are 4 key issues that the developer needs to be aware of.
Energy and CO2 emissions – the Government has set a target that all new homes in England will have net zero CO2 emissions form 2016 (2012 in Wales).
The significance of this increases with the desired target star rating. BRE’s Off-Site exhibition has 6 low-energy houses on show, only 1 of which achieves zero carbon. We know that at least 2 others tried for 6 Star and failed. Given that these houses were designed and built by companies like Stewart Milne, Kingspan and Hanson it is an indication of how hard the standard is to reach.
The Government has also recently announced that grid electricity from a green source, e.g. an off-shore wind farm, no longer qualifies as zero carbon unless the development is directly linked to the source, i.e. not grid linked. This means that to achieve level 3 or over will need on-site renewable energy generation. At level 3, solar thermal panels are likely to be enough but beyond that electricity generation becomes a necessity and developers will need to think about wind turbines or solar PV. Which calls into question the whole idea of developing urban brownfield sites.
Water use – The average UK citizen uses 150 litres of water per day. The Code looks to reduce this to below 80 litres. Of course this means low- flush toilets and low-flow showers, but to get beyond level 4 means using less than 90 litres per person and that can only be achieved by introducing alternative water sources, i.e. rainwater harvesting and/or grey water recycling. Low-flush toilets may add a few pounds to the build cost but adding a rainwater harvesting system will add a couple of thousand.
Materials and Waste – The argument behind this is that some 80% of materials used in a conventional build are virgin materials and about 12% of that material goes straight to landfill, without ever being used. Sustainable materials – FSC timber, sustainable insulation, timber windows and doors, add cost to the build, but recycling material and using recycled materials can help to balance this. The DTI, with the co-operation of 2 major developers, carried out some tests in 2005/06 and found that sorting waste and re- using material cut the project cost by up to 8%. The extra costs and/or savings in this category is one area more readily controlled and managed by the developer.
AS FROM APRIL 2008,
ALL PLANNING APPLICATIONS WILL NEED TO REFERENCE THE CODE
Minimising ecological impact – 12% of the overall points score under the Code are available for the Ecology category. Only Health & Well Being and Energy categories have more points available. Put simply, to gain a good score the Code requires that the site have an initial low ecological value and that the development improve that value by encouraging more species of flora and fauna. In a typical housing development, where space is often at a premium, this can be difficult. There is no minimum mandatory standard here, but it is difficult to get to level 4 and beyond without a good score in this category. It will be necessary to invest in an Ecologist, in appropriate protection to existing features (trees, hedges, ponds, streams, etc) and in new ecological planting and features.
What will it Cost? As of January 2008, the BRE had still to decide what the costs to the developer are likely to be. From experience with EcoHomes it is known that even a 1 Star rating will have a cost in terms of the fees paid to BRE and the assessor. A 4 star rating or above will involve renewable energy and rainwater harvesting, as well as sustainable materials, top quality site management and fees for a qualified Ecologist and a CSH Assessor. The cost per property will vary with the number of dwellings on the site and with the number of property types as well as the star rating being aimed at. The developer will need to go through a process of quantifying and costing the proposed development against the Code and balancing the cost against the desired star rating.
Is it a Good Idea? Currently, the energy used to heat, light and run our homes accounts for 27% of all of the UK's carbon emissions - around 40 million tonnes per year. Energy efficient and insulated buildings, which draw their energy from zero or low carbon technologies will help but they are not the end of the story. A conventionally built 3 to 4 bedroom house has embodied in it some 44 tonnes of CO2 . The Code seeks to reduce the emissions from every house, but also to reduce the energy embodied in each house. They are also aimed at extending the life of the house from the current 60 years to 80 years plus.
It may be that climate change is no more than scare-mongering and that this is all unnecessary. In which case we end up with houses that will last longer, are cheaper to run and set in more pleasant surroundings. If climate change is real and we do nothing the outcome is catastrophic. The Code is difficult; it sets hard targets, changes the way we build houses, makes us think about the methods and materials we use. With oil at over $100 a barrel it is difficult to see how that can be a bad thing.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76