Page 20
Vetting and barring
The vetting and barring scheme, which aims to safeguard children, young people and vulnerable adults, will be introduced in 2010. NUT assistant secretary for employment conditions and rights, Amanda Brown, explains why the NUT is concerned about it.
In July 2010, the work of the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) begins in earnest. Over the following five years, those who work with children, young people and vulnerable adults will be required to register with the ISA under the new vetting and barring scheme. The ISA will check the records of almost 10 million individuals, deciding whether they are suitable for their chosen occupation or volunteering activity and, if satisfied, accepting them for recording, under a unique registration number, on a publicly accessible database.
Last year, the scheme caught the public’s attention as some of those affected spoke out at what they saw as over-regulation, forcing the government to announce a review of the scheme by the chair of the ISA, Sir Roger Singleton. A number of well known children’s writers, including Philip Pullman, Anne Fine and Anthony Horowitz, publicised their reluctance to be registered before being able to visit schools. Parents were worried they would have to stop driving other people’s children to or from school or clubs.
Eventually the government bowed to Sir Roger’s recommendation that the scheme be overhauled, relieving an estimated 3 million volunteers from the duty to register. Now only those who work at least once a week in a role covered by the scheme must register, and there will be exemptions for parents hosting school exchange students and for pupils on work experience.
About the scheme
The changes are a step forward, though some say the scheme is still disproportionately intrusive. Child protection measures were put in place to prevent those who had not had criminal record checks from having unsupervised contact with children. Now the focus has shifted to how an individual might be perceived by children. Anyone who might be seen as a trustworthy representative of the school should be checked. So regular visitors will come within the scheme’s remit.
CONTINUES ON PAGE 21
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52