veloped world is already declining and may continue to decline
in the future (Balmford et al. 2005), potentially freeing up land
area that may be used to sequester carbon. Recent evidence
shows that carbon gains have occurred in agricultural land
abandoned after the collapse of the Soviet Union (soil gains of
0.47 t C per hectare per year, Vuichard et al. 2009). This is
also known to be true of abandoned lands in Europe and North
America as it is in the early stages of succession and forest de-
velopment that carbon sink strength is strongest.
Biochar: A Panacea?
Biochar is a new and poorly understood technology and it
is likely that its effectiveness as a carbon storing strategy
will depend heavily upon economic and environmental fac-
tors. Research is still at a preliminary stage and large-scale
biochar deployment is inadvisable until these uncertainties
are resolved.
Biochar is an emerging technology in which organic materi-
als are reduced by pyrolosis at temperatures of 350–500ºC,
producing energy and a carbon rich charcoal that is returned
to the soil as a stable form of soil carbon. Research to date
has indicated that biochar may have the potential to seques-
ter significant amounts of carbon, while providing benefits
to soil fertility and nutrient retention (Lehmann et al. 2006)
Nevertheless, the creation of biochar plantations should
be approached with great caution. While the use of biochar
could be realised in a number of ways including shifting cul-
tivation, charcoal production and the recycling of agricultural
wastes (Lehmann et al. 2006) the most likely large-scale
source of biochar production is from the burning of biofuels.
To be justified as a carbon storage strategy, the amount se-
questered must exceed that produced in moving it between
its site of production, burning and application. In the case
of crop residues it must be ensured that biochar addition
provides a similar carbon gain to the simple return of these
materials at the site of production. The impacts of large-scale
biochar production on biodiversity and long-term agricultural
sustainability (e.g. nutrient depletion) are unknown.
3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68